Chaney Creek Coal Corp., B.D.C. Coal Corporation, and Woods Creek Corporation (ALJ decision, September 23, 1987)
Chaney Creek Coal Corp., B.D.C. Coal Corporation, and Woods Creek Corporation (FMSHRC KENT 86-55-D): Discrimination settlement approved for $16,365
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chaney Creek Coal Corp., B.D.C. Coal Corporation, and Woods Creek Corporation settled James C. Gray, Jr.'s discrimination proceeding. The companies agreed to pay Gray $16,365 and remove references to his discharge from his employment record, while the Secretary waived pre-judgment interest and the civil penalty. Judge Roy J. Maurer approved the agreement and dismissed the proceeding subject to payment.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: The settlement was approved and the discrimination proceeding was dismissed subject to payment of $16,365.
- Key point: The approved settlement resolved the complainant's claim without reinstatement and required the respondents to expunge references to his discharge.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. CHANEY CREEK
DDATE:
19870923
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1690
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 86-55-D
ON BEHALF OF
JAMES C. GRAY, JR.,
BARB CD 85-47
COMPLAINANT
v.
CHANEY CREEK COAL CORP.,
B.D.C. COAL CORPORATION, AND
WOODS CREEK CORPORATION,
RESPONDENTS
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING
Before: Judge Maurer
On September 21, 1987, the Secretary submitted a settlement agreement, signed by all parties to this proceeding, including the individual complainant himself, for approval.
By the terms of the settlement agreement, the respondents have agreed to pay to James C. Gray, Jr., the total sum of $16,365 in full and complete settlement of his claim. There is no longer any issue of reinstatement in the case. Respondents have further agreed to expunge from Mr. Gray's record any reference to his discharge in this case. The Secretary of Labor has agreed to waive pre-judgment interest and the civil penalty.
I have considered the agreement in the light of the policies of the Act and conclude that it should be approved.
Accordingly, the settlement agreement IS APPROVED, and, subject to the payment of the agreed amount, $16,365, to Complainant Gray, this proceeding IS DISMISSED.
Roy J. Maurer
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace