Smith v. Bow Valley Coal Resources, Inc.

Plain-English summary

Harley M. Smith brought a discrimination case against Bow Valley Coal Resources under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. An ALJ had found that Bow Valley unlawfully discharged Smith and ordered reinstatement, approximately $52,880 in back pay plus interest, attorney fees, and costs. While the Commission's review was pending, the parties submitted a settlement agreement signed by Smith and identified Great Western Coal as Bow Valley's successor. The Commission approved the settlement, vacated its direction for review, and dismissed the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

• Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. and 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1)
• Outcome: The settlement was approved, the direction for review was vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
• Key point: The Commission may approve a settlement that resolves all issues on review and dismiss the proceeding.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
HARLEY SMITH V. BOW VALLEY COAL RESOURCES
DDATE:
19871229
TTEXT:

                                    FMSHRC-WDC
                                   December 29, 1987

HARLEY M. SMITH
Docket Nos. KENT 86-23-D
v. KENT 86-84-D

BOW VALLEY COAL RESOURCES, INC.

BEFORE: Ford, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, Lastowka and Nelson,
Commissioners

               ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

In this discrimination case arising under the Federal Mine

Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $801 et seq. (1982), a
Joint Motion to Dismiss has been filed based on settlement. For the
reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

In decisions issued on April 14, 1987, and August 19, 1987,

Commission Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger concluded that
Bow Valley Coal Resources, Inc. ("Bow Valley"), had unlawfully
discharged Complainant Harley M. Smith in violation of section
105(c)(1) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. $815(c)(1), and ordered Bow
Valley to reinstate Mr. Smith and to pay him approximately $52,880 in
back pay plus interest, $2,500 in attorney's fees, and miscellaneous
costs. 9 FMSHRC 735 (April 1987) (ALJ); 9 FMSHRC 1468 (August 1987)
(ALJ). Bow Valley filed a petition for discretionary review, which
the Commission granted on September 25, 1987.

On October 28, 1987, we issued an order granting the

complainant's motion to stay proceedings on review pending submission
of a dismissal motion based on the parties' settlement of the case.
On November 16, 1987, the Commission received a brief Joint Motion
to Dismiss, stating that the parties "have reached an agreement
which disposes of all issues raised herein." The motion was signed
on behalf of Great Western Coal Inc. ("Great Western"), which was

Page 2

described as the "successor" to Bow Valley. The Commission
administratively directed the parties to supplement the record by
submitting the actual settlement agreement. Cf. Secretary of Labor
on behalf of John Koerner v. Arch Mineral Coal Co., 1 FMSHRC 471
(June 1979). The Commission has now received that

Page 3

~2034
agreement, which is signed by Smith, and certain additional
information concerning the agreement.

Upon consideration of the record as supplemented, we approve
the settlement and grant the dismissal motion. Accordingly, our
direction for review is vacated and the proceeding is dismissed.

               Ford B. Ford, Chairman

               Richard V. Backley, Commissioner

               Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner

               James A. Lastowka, Commissioner

               L. Clair Nelson, Commissioner

Distribution

John C. Carter, Esq.
Smith & Carter
105 Central Street
Harlan, Kentucky 40831

Joshua E. Santana, Esq.
Brown, Bucalos, Santana & Bratt
201 West Short Street
Lexington, Kentucky 40507

Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1000
Falls Church, Virginia 22041