Smith v. Bow Valley Coal Resources, Inc. (Commission decision, December 29, 1987)
Smith v. Bow Valley Coal Resources, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 86-23-D and KENT 86-84-D): Settlement approved and case dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1987, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Harley M. Smith brought a discrimination case against Bow Valley Coal Resources under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act. An ALJ had found that Bow Valley unlawfully discharged Smith and ordered reinstatement, approximately $52,880 in back pay plus interest, attorney fees, and costs. While the Commission's review was pending, the parties submitted a settlement agreement signed by Smith and identified Great Western Coal as Bow Valley's successor. The Commission approved the settlement, vacated its direction for review, and dismissed the proceeding.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. and 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the direction for review was vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The Commission may approve a settlement that resolves all issues on review and dismiss the proceeding.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
HARLEY SMITH V. BOW VALLEY COAL RESOURCES DDATE: 19871229 TTEXT:
FMSHRC-WDC
December 29, 1987
HARLEY M. SMITH
Docket Nos. KENT 86-23-D
v. KENT 86-84-D
BOW VALLEY COAL RESOURCES, INC.
BEFORE: Ford, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, Lastowka and Nelson, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
In this discrimination case arising under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $801 et seq. (1982), a Joint Motion to Dismiss has been filed based on settlement. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
In decisions issued on April 14, 1987, and August 19, 1987, Commission Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger concluded that Bow Valley Coal Resources, Inc. ("Bow Valley"), had unlawfully discharged Complainant Harley M. Smith in violation of section 105(c)(1) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. $815(c)(1), and ordered Bow Valley to reinstate Mr. Smith and to pay him approximately $52,880 in back pay plus interest, $2,500 in attorney's fees, and miscellaneous costs. 9 FMSHRC 735 (April 1987) (ALJ); 9 FMSHRC 1468 (August 1987) (ALJ). Bow Valley filed a petition for discretionary review, which the Commission granted on September 25, 1987.
On October 28, 1987, we issued an order granting the complainant's motion to stay proceedings on review pending submission of a dismissal motion based on the parties' settlement of the case. On November 16, 1987, the Commission received a brief Joint Motion to Dismiss, stating that the parties "have reached an agreement which disposes of all issues raised herein." The motion was signed on behalf of Great Western Coal Inc. ("Great Western"), which was
Page 2
described as the "successor" to Bow Valley. The Commission administratively directed the parties to supplement the record by submitting the actual settlement agreement. Cf. Secretary of Labor on behalf of John Koerner v. Arch Mineral Coal Co., 1 FMSHRC 471 (June 1979). The Commission has now received that
Page 3
~2034
agreement, which is signed by Smith, and certain additional information concerning the agreement.
Upon consideration of the record as supplemented, we approve the settlement and grant the dismissal motion. Accordingly, our direction for review is vacated and the proceeding is dismissed.
Ford B. Ford, Chairman
Richard V. Backley, Commissioner
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
James A. Lastowka, Commissioner
L. Clair Nelson, Commissioner
Distribution
John C. Carter, Esq.
Smith & Carter
105 Central Street
Harlan, Kentucky 40831
Joshua E. Santana, Esq.
Brown, Bucalos, Santana & Bratt
201 West Short Street
Lexington, Kentucky 40507
Administrative Law Judge Avram Weisberger Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission 5203 Leesburg Pike, Suite 1000 Falls Church, Virginia 22041
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace