Highwire, Incorporated
Highwire, Incorporated (FMSHRC KENT 86-166-R): Citation contest dismissed after withdrawal
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Highwire, Incorporated contested Citation No. 2776209 at its No. 1 Mine. When the case was called for a scheduled hearing, Highwire's counsel said the company no longer wished to pursue the contest and asked to withdraw it. Judge George A. Koutras granted the request and dismissed the case. The order does not state a penalty amount or decide the underlying citation.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: None cited in the order.
- Outcome: The citation contest was withdrawn and dismissed.
- Key point: A contestant may withdraw its contest before the scheduled hearing, after which the proceeding is dismissed.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
HIGHWIRE INC V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19871008
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1755
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
HIGHWIRE, INCORPORATED, CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. KENT 86-166-R
v. Citation No. 2776209; 8/27/86
SECRETARY OF LABOR, No. 1 Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Appearances: Eugene C. Rice, Esq., Paintsville, Kentucky,
for Contestant; Thomas A. Grooms, Esq.,
Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department
of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Koutras
This proceeding was one of eight cases scheduled for hearing
in Paintsville, Kentucky, during the hearing term September
22−23, 1987. When the case was called, contestant's counsel
advised me that the contestant no longer wished to pursue its
contest, and requested that it be permitted to withdraw its
contest. The request was granted, and this case IS DISMISSED.
George A. Koutras
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1987, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.