Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Dixie Fuel Company (ALJ decision, January 14, 1986)

Secretary of Labor v. Dixie Fuel Company (FMSHRC KENT 85-124): $7,900 settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 85-124
Decided
January 14, 1986
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1986
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA cited Dixie Fuel Company for a ventilation violation and a roof control violation at its No. 1 Mine. The roof control violation resulted in one fatal injury and three nonfatal injuries. Judge James A. Broderick approved a settlement of $400 for the ventilation citation and $7,500 for the roof control citation. The order also requires Dixie Fuel to give miners its approved roof control plan and pay them to attend an MSHA roof control class by February 7, 1986. The $7,900 payment is due within 30 days after the class, and the proceeding is dismissed once the payment and other conditions are met.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.316 and 75.200.
  • Outcome: Settlement approved for $7,900, with roof control plan and training requirements.
  • Key point: The judge approved a conditional settlement that included paid roof control training for the miners.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
2 SKYLINE, 10th FLOOR
5203 LEESBURG PIKE
FALLS CHURCH, VIRGINIA 22041

JAN 14 1986

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
: CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
: Docket No. KENT 85-124
Petitioner : A.C. No. 15-00590-03527 :
v. : No. 1 Mine
:
DIXIE FUEL COMPANY,
:
Respondent :

DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Thomas A. Grooms, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner; William A. Rice, Esq., Harlan, Kentucky, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Broderick

The above case was called for hearing pursuant to notice on December 17, 1985 in Pineville, Kentucky. At the opening of the hearing, counsel made a motion on the record for the approval of a settlement agreement reached by the parties.

The case involves two citations, one for an alleged violation of the ventilation standard, originally assessed at $400.00, the other for an alleged violation of the roof control plan originally assessed at $10,000.00. The agreement proposes to settle for payment of $400.00 and $7500.00 for the violations.

The operator operates two mines which in 1983 produced 223,504 tons of coal and in 1984 242,784 tons. There were 9 prior violations of 30 C.F.R. § 75.316, and 27 prior violations of 30 C.F.R. § 75.200.

The ventilation violation alleged that the air had dropped below the required 9000 cubic feet per minute at the last open crosscut. Less than one tenth of one percent methane was present. Because the operator could not determine the reason for the air loss after diligent effort, the area was abandoned.

The roof control violation was extremely serious. It resulted in one fatal injury, and 3 other nonfatal injuries.

The citation charged that while advancing toward the outcrop, subnormal roof conditions were encountered and a sufficient number of additional roof supports were not installed to adequately support the roof. Respondent's history of prior roof control violations is not good and includes another fatal roof fall in May, 1983. The mine in question has been closed, having been operated for only two weeks in 1985.

As part of the settlement agreement, Respondent has agreed to make available to all miners in its two mines a copy of the approved roof control plan. It has further agreed that all the miners up to and including section foremen will attend a training class in roof control to be conducted by MSHA at its Harlan, Kentucky office. The class will be held on company time, that is, the miners will be paid at their regular rates of pay for attending the class.

I have carefully considered the settlement agreement in the light of the criteria in section 110(i) of the Act, and conclude that it should be approved.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the settlement agreement proposed on the record December 17, 1985 is APPROVED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall make available to each of its miner-employees a copy of the current approved roof control plan.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Respondent's miner-employees, up to and including section foremen, shall attend a roof control class at the MSHA office in Harlan, Kentucky and they shall be paid by Respondent at their regular rates of pay. This class shall be held on or before February 7, 1986.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall pay the sum of $7900.00 within 30 days after the roof control class referred to above is held, and subject to the payment and the other conditions set out above being fulfilled, this proceeding is DISMISSED.

James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Thomas A. Grooms, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 280 U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN 37203 (Certified Mail)

William A. Rice, Esq., Rice, Huff & Henderickson, 417 East Mound Street, Harlan, KY 40831 (Certified Mail)

slk

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace