Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Bartley & Bartley Coal Company (ALJ decision, November 9, 1983)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Bartley & Bartley Coal Company (FMSHRC KENT 82-66): Default order assesses $22 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1983 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought a civil penalty against Bartley & Bartley Coal Company for a citation under 30 C.F.R. § 77.516 at its No. 4 Mine. The company did not appear at the scheduled hearing. Judge Richard C. Steffey then sent an order requiring it to explain why it should not be found in default, but the company did not respond. He entered a default decision and assessed the proposed $22 penalty. The order requires payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 77.516.
- Outcome: Citation affirmed by default; $22 penalty assessed.
- Key point: Failure to appear at the hearing and respond to the show-cause order resulted in a default decision.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BARTLEY & BARTLEY COAL
DDATE:
19831109
TTEXT:
~1944
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 82-66
PETITIONER
A. C. No. 15-12650-03009
v. No. 4 Mine
BARTLEY & BARTLEY COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
Appearances: Darryl A. Stewart, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner No one appeared at the hearing on behalf of Respondent
DEFAULT DECISION
Before: Judge Steffey
When the hearing in the above-entitled proceeding was convened in Pikeville, Kentucky, on October 6, 1983, pursuant to a written notice of hearing dated September 8, 1983, and received by respondent on September 12, 1983, counsel for the Secretary of Labor entered his appearance, but no one appeared at the hearing to represent respondent.
Under the provisions of 29 C.F.R. 2700.63(a), when a party fails to comply with an order of a judge, an order to show cause shall be directed to the party before the entry of any order of default. An order to show cause was sent to respondent on October 12, 1983, pursuant to section 2700.63(a), requiring respondent to show cause why it should not be found to be in default for failure to appear at the hearing convened on October 6, 1983. A return receipt in the official file shows that respondent received the show-cause order on October 14, 1983. The time within which a reply to the show-cause order should have been received has passed and no reply has been submitted.
Inasmuch as no reply to the show-cause order was submitted, I find respondent to be in default for failure to appear at the hearing convened on October 6, 1983. Section 2700.63(b) of the Commission's rules provides that "[w]hen the Judge finds the respondent in default in a civil penalty proceeding, the Judge shall also enter a summary order assessing the proposed penalties as final, and directing that such penalties be paid."
WHEREFORE, it is ordered:
~1945
Bartley and Bartley Coal Company, having been found to be in default, is ordered, within 30 days from the date of this decision, to pay a civil penalty of $22.00 for the violation of 30 C.F.R. 77.516 alleged in Citation No. 953536 dated July 29, 1981.
Richard C. Steffey
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace