Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Little Bill Coal Co., Inc. (ALJ decision, November 25, 1980)

Secretary of Labor v. Little Bill Coal (FMSHRC KENT 80-203, et al.): $1,774 default penalty assessed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 80-203, KENT 80-194, KENT 80-261, KENT 80-262, KENT 80-263, KENT 80-193
Decided
November 25, 1980
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1980 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Little Bill Coal did not provide information required by a pretrial order in six civil penalty dockets. After the judge issued a show-cause order, the company said it was trying to prepare its defenses but still did not supply the information or ask for more time. Judge Joseph B. Kennedy declared the company in default for failing to comply with the pretrial order. He assessed MSHA's proposed $1,774 penalty and ordered payment by December 15, 1980. The order does not identify the underlying safety standards.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: None identified in this order.
  • Outcome: Default entered and the proposed $1,774 penalty assessed across the consolidated proceedings.
  • Key point: The judge imposed the proposed penalty after the operator failed to comply with the pretrial order and did not cure its default.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. LITTLE BILL COAL
DDATE:
19801125
TTEXT:

~3419

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Civil Penalty Proceedings
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. KENT 80-203
PETITIONER A.O. No. 15-11645-03008

v. Docket No. KENT 80-194
A.O. No. 15-11645-03007 T
LITTLE BILL COAL CO., INC.,
RESPONDENT Docket No. KENT 80-261 A.O. No. 15-11645-03009

Mine No. 4

Docket No. KENT 80-262
A.O. No. 15-11838-03001

Docket No. KENT 80-263
A.O. No. 11-11838-03002

Mine No. 5

Docket No. KENT 80-193
A.O. No. 15-10394-03012

Mine No. 6

ORDER ASSESSING DEFAULT PENALTY

The pretrial order of September 2, 1980, in the captioned matters, required compliance by both parties with Part A thereof on or before October 17, 1980, and compliance with Part B on or before November 17, 1980. The pretrial order required inter alia that "it is expected that respondent will cooperate in furnishing [specified information] to counsel for the Secretary," and further stated that "except for good cause shown in advance thereof, any failure to comply in full and on time with the provisions of this order shall be deemed cause for the issuance of an order of dismissal or default."

On September 5, 1980, counsel for the Secretary sent a letter to counsel for respondent in which he requested the information required by the order. No response has ever been made to this letter. When respondent failed to comply with the requirements of Part A of the pretrial order, an order issued on October 22, 1980, directing respondent to show cause why it should not be held in default. In response to the show cause

~3420
order, respondent stated that it had not yet been able to prepare its defenses, and that "efforts are now being made to comply." Over a month has elapsed since then, and respondent has failed to cure its deliquency with respect to Part A of the pretrial order, or to comply with the requirements of Part B. I should further note that this respondent has a history of failure to comply with the orders of the trial judge. See Little Bill Coal Co., KENT 79-261 (June 30, 1980) review denied (August 26, 1980). Such course of conduct cannot be condoned.

Accordingly, respondent having (1) failed to cooperate with counsel for the Secretary as required by the pretrial order, (2) failed to cure its delinquency with regard to Part A of the order, (3) failed to make any response to Part B of the order, and (4) failed to request a reasonable amount of time in which to effect compliance; it is ORDERED that respondent be, and hereby is, declared in DEFAULT.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63 of the Commission's rules the proposed penalty of $1,774 be, and hereby is, ASSESSED as a FINAL ORDER of the Commission. Finally, it is ORDERED that respondent pay the amount finally assessed, $1,774, on or before Monday, December 15, 1980.

Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace