Secretary of Labor on behalf of George Rice v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises (ALJ decision, September 28, 2022)
Secretary of Labor on behalf of George Rice v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises (FMSHRC KENT 2022-0118): Temporary economic reinstatement agreement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2022 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary obtained an amended order temporarily reinstating miner George Rice while MSHA considered his discrimination claim against Nally & Hamilton Enterprises. The parties then asked to substitute a temporary economic-reinstatement agreement that was retroactive to September 22, 2022. The agreement allowed the operator to require Rice's physical return after October 21 with five days' written notice; otherwise, economic reinstatement would continue until a final Commission order, dissolution of the agreement, or another agreed date. Judge Thomas McCarthy found the agreement fair, reasonable, appropriate, and protective of the public interest. He modified the prior physical-reinstatement order to incorporate the agreement and ordered the parties to comply with it.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2)
- Outcome: The temporary economic-reinstatement agreement was approved and incorporated into the prior reinstatement order.
- Key point: The approved agreement substituted economic reinstatement while preserving the operator's option to call the miner back to physical work with advance notice.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9900
/ FAX: 202-434-9949
SECRETARY
OF LABOR
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) on behalf of GEORGE RICE,
Complainant
v.
NALLY
& HAMILTON ENTERPRISES,
Respondent
TEMPORARY
REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDING
Docket
No. KENT 2022-0118
MSHA
Case No. BARB-CD-2022-03
Mine:
Meadow Branch Mine
Mine
ID: 15-19890
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO APPROVE TEMPORARY ECONOMIC REINSTATEMENT AGREEMENT
Before: Judge
McCarthy
This matter is before me on the Secretary of Labor’s Application for Temporary Reinstatement filed on behalf of miner George Rice pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., as amended (“Mine Act”), and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.45. On September 26, 2022, I issued an Amended Order granting temporary physical reinstatement to Rice. On September 28, 2022, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Approve a Temporary Economic Reinstatement Agreement (“Motion”).
The Agreement is “retroactive to September
22, 2022” and will “remain in effect until and through October 21, 2022.” Should Nally & Hamilton want Rice “to physically return to work on Monday, October 24, 2022, or at any date thereafter, Nally & Hamilton shall inform Rice in writing no less than five (5) days prior to the date it expects Rice to physically return to work that it elects its option for him to physically return to work pursuant to the September 26, 2022 Amended Order Granting Temporary Reinstatement issued by Judge McCarthy, rather than receive the economic temporary reinstatement benefits provided under this Economic TR Agreement.”
Unless Nally & Hamilton exercises its
option to have Rice physically return to work after October 21, 2022, “then the Economic Temporary Reinstatement of Rice shall remain in effect until the entry of a final order of the Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission (“the Commission”) regarding Rice’s underlying discrimination complaint (MSHA Case No. BARB-CD-2022-03) or until the ALJ’s order approving this Agreement is dissolved, whichever shall occur first - with the exception that the parties may agree to extend this Agreement until another date certain.”
The full terms and conditions of the
parties’ economic reinstatement agreement are hereby incorporated by reference. I have reviewed the joint settlement motion and I conclude that the proposed economic reinstatement agreement is fair, reasonable, appropriate, and protects the public interest because it will further the intent and purpose of the Mine Act.
For the foregoing reasons, my Amended Order
issued September 26, 2022 is hereby MODIFIED to reflect the terms of the economic reinstatement agreement described by the parties in their Motion. The parties are ORDERED to comply with all of the terms and conditions contained therein.
This Order approving temporary economic
reinstatement expires consistent with the terms of the parties’ agreement. The Secretary must promptly determine whether or not he will file a complaint with the Commission under section 105(c)(2) of the Act and so advise the Respondent and this tribunal.
/s/ Thomas P.
McCarthy
Thomas P. McCarthy
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Thomas Hamilton
Nally &
Hamilton Enterprises
Saltsman Willett
Deton & Hamilton, PSC
212 E. Stephen
Foster Avenue
Bardstown, KY
40004
Joseph Mattingly
JOSEPH H.
MATTINGLY, PLLC
P.O. Box 678 - 104
West Main Street
Lebanon, Kentucky
40033
Tony Oppegard
P.O. Box 22446
Lexington, KY
40522
Wes Addington
Appalachian
Citizens’ Law Center
317 Main Street
Whitesburg, KY
41858
Jennifer M. Tag
Office of the
Solicitor
U. S. Department
of Labor
618 Church Street
Suite 230
Nashville,
Tennessee 37219
/vgr
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace