Secretary of Labor on behalf of George Rice v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises
Secretary of Labor on behalf of George Rice v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises (FMSHRC KENT 2022-0118): Temporary economic reinstatement ended with Secretary's case
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2022 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary obtained temporary reinstatement for miner George Rice while MSHA investigated his discrimination claim against Nally & Hamilton Enterprises. The parties then agreed to temporary economic reinstatement and provided that the operator could seek dissolution if the Secretary declined to prosecute the merits complaint. After the Secretary gave that notice, Nally & Hamilton moved to dissolve the order. Judge Thomas McCarthy held that temporary reinstatement ended when the Secretary's involvement ended, dissolved the reinstatement order, and terminated the economic-reinstatement agreement. Rice remained free to file his own discrimination complaint within 30 days of notice of the Secretary's determination.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: The temporary reinstatement order was dissolved, and the temporary economic-reinstatement agreement was terminated.
- Key point: Under the parties' agreement and cited precedent, temporary reinstatement ended when the Secretary declined to file a discrimination complaint.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE.,
N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE: 202-434-9900
/ FAX: 202-434-9949
SECRETARY
OF LABOR
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) on behalf of GEORGE RICE,
Complainant
v.
NALLY
& HAMILTON ENTERPRISES,
Respondent
TEMPORARY
REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDING
Docket
No. KENT 2022-0118
MSHA
Case No. BARB-CD-2022-03
Mine:
Meadow Branch Mine
Mine
ID: 15-19890
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISSOLVE ORDER
GRANTING TEMPORARY
ECONOMIC REINSTATEMENT
Before: Judge
McCarthy
This matter is before the undersigned on the Secretary
of Labor’s Application for Temporary Reinstatement filed on behalf of miner George
Rice pursuant to Section 105(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., as amended (“Act”), and 29 C.F.R.
§ 2700.45.
On September 26, 2022, the undersigned issued an Amended
Order Granting Temporary Reinstatement of Rice. On September 27, 2022, the
parties submitted a Joint Motion to Approve Temporary Economic Reinstatement Agreement
(“Agreement”). The parties agreed that, “[i]f the Secretary notifies Rice that
he has decided not to prosecute Rice’s case on the merits, Nally & Hamilton
will file a motion with the presiding ALJ to dissolve this Agreement, and Rice
will not oppose said motion.” Agreement, 2. On September 28, 2022, the
undersigned accepted the Agreement and issued an Order modifying the September 26,
2022 Order.
On October 14, 2022, the Secretary filed a Notice
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 2700.45(g) that he was not going to file a Discrimination
Complaint on Rice’s behalf. On October 18, 2022, the Respondent filed a Motion
to Dissolve the Order Granting Temporary Economic Reinstatement.
Federal circuit courts of appeals and Commission judges
have ruled that, for 105(c) claims such as this one, any “temporary
reinstatement provision ends when the Secretary’s involvement ends” and that
“the termination of [a temporary reinstatement] should rest on the Secretary’s
determination” to not file a Discrimination Complaint. Vulcan Const. v.
FMSHRC , 700 F.3d 297, 310, 311 (7th Cir. 2012); see also N. Fork
Coal Corp. v. FMSHRC , 691 F.3d 735, 744 (6th Cir. 2012); Panther
Creek Mining, LLC , 39 FMSHRC 2001, 2002 (Oct. 2017) (ALJ); Black
River Coal, LLC , 38 FMSHRC 2869, 2870 (Nov. 2016) (ALJ); Teck Alaska,
Inc. , 35 FMSHRC 2891, 2893 (Aug. 2013) (ALJ).
After finding insufficient evidence to pursue a
Discrimination Complaint, the Secretary’s involvement ended. Pursuant to precedent
and the Agreement, the September 26, 2022 Amended Order Granting Temporary
Reinstatement, as modified by the September 28, 2022 Order, is dissolved.
For the foregoing reasons, the September
26, 2022 Order, as modified by the September 28, 2022 Order, is DISSOLVED and
the terms of the September 27, 2022 Temporary Economic Reinstatement Agreement are
TERMINATED . Mr. Rice may elect to file a Discrimination Complaint on his
own behalf with the Commission within 30 days’ notice of the Secretary’s
determination. 30 U.S.C. 815(c)(3).
/s/
Thomas P. McCarthy
Thomas P. McCarthy
Administrative
Law Judge
Distribution:
Thomas
Hamilton
Nally
& Hamilton Enterprises
Saltsman
Willett Deton & Hamilton, PSC
212
E. Stephen Foster Avenue
Bardstown,
KY 40004
Joseph
Mattingly
JOSEPH
H. MATTINGLY, PLLC
P.O.
Box 678 - 104 West Main Street
Lebanon,
KY 40033
Tony
Oppegard
P.O.
Box 22446
Lexington,
KY 40522
Wes
Addington
Appalachian
Citizens’ Law Center
317
Main Street
Whitesburg,
KY 41858
Jennifer
M. Tag
Office
of the Solicitor
U.
S. Department of Labor
618
Church Street, Suite 230
Nashville,
TN 37219
/vgr
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2022, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.