FMSHRC Commission decision Docket KENT 2019-0205 Decided March 24, 2021 Remanded

Secretary of Labor v. River View Coal, LLC

Secretary of Labor v. River View Coal, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2019-0205): Emailed contest supported reopening

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

River View Coal asked the Commission to reopen a penalty assessment that became final after the contest deadline passed. The company said it had attempted to email its notice of contest before the deadline, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission found good cause to relieve River View from the final order. It reopened the matter, remanded it for further proceedings, and required the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.28
  • Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and the case was remanded.
  • Key point: An attempted timely contest by email supported relief from the final order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH      

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)         

v.

RIVER
VIEW COAL, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. KENT 2019-0205

A.C.
No. 15-19374-481326

BEFORE: Traynor, Chair; Althen and Rajkovich,
Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. §
801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On April 24, 2020, the Commission received
from River View Coal, LLC a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that
had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the
Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR ,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that,
if the defaulting party can make a showing of good
cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and
appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs.,
Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that a proposed assessment was delivered on January 18, 2019, and
became a final order on February 17, 2019. River View asserts that it attempted
to file the notice of contest for the captioned proceeding on February 11, 2019
by email.

The Secretary does not oppose
the request to reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that
future penalty contests are timely filed and sent to MSHA’s Civil Penalty Compliance
Office at the address stated in the proposed penalty assessment.

Having
reviewed River View’s request and the
Secretary’s response, we find good cause to relieve River View from the
final order. In the interest of justice, we
hereby reopen this matter and remand the case to the Chief Administrative Law
Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s
Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule
28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45
days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/ Arthur R. Traynor, III

Arthur R. Traynor, III, Chair

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Commissioner

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.

Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Commissioner

Distribution:

Kevin Vaughn

Director of Safety and Training

River View Coal, LLC

835 SR 1179

Waverly, KY 42462

[email protected]

John
M. McCracken, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

Division
of Mine Safety and Health

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5452

[email protected]

April
Nelson, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5452

[email protected]

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Glynn Voisin

Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

[email protected]

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine Safety
and Health Administration

201
12th Street South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5452

[email protected]

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2021. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.