Secretary of Labor v. Revelation Energy, LLC (Commission decision, March 14, 2018)
Secretary of Labor v. Revelation Energy, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2016-311): Timely answer made default order a nullity
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Revelation Energy asked the Commission to reopen a default order entered after the operator appeared not to answer the Secretary's civil-penalty petition. Revelation showed that it had mailed a timely answer and notice of contest but mistakenly wrote docket number KENT 2016-0331 instead of KENT 2016-0311. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission held that Revelation was never in default because its response to the penalty petition was timely, making both the show-cause order and default order nullities. It treated the reopening motion as moot and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: The Mine Act and Commission procedural rules in 29 C.F.R. Part 2700
- Outcome: The default and show-cause orders were declared nullities, the reopening motion was moot, and the case was remanded.
- Key point: A timely answer filed with a clerical docket-number error prevented default when the filing clearly responded to the penalty petition.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)
v.
REVELATION
ENERGY, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. KENT 2016-311
A.C.
No. 15-19737-405260
BEFORE: Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On September 20, 2016, the Commission received from Revelation Energy, LLC (“Revelation”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the Default Order entered against it.
On
July 5, 2016, the Chief Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause in response to Revelation’s perceived failure to answer the Secretary of Labor’s May 18, 2016 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. By its terms, the Order to Show Cause was deemed a Default Order on August 5, 2016, when it appeared that the operator had not filed an answer within 31 days.
Revelation asserts that it mailed its
Answer and Notice of Contest on June 16, 2016, but due to a clerical error included the docket number “KENT 2016-0331” instead of “KENT 2016-0311.” The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
Having reviewed Revelation’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the operator was not in default under the terms of the Order to Show Cause because it filed a timely response to the penalty petition. See Eagle Creek Mining, LLC , 35 FMSHRC 781, 782 (Apr. 2013). This renders the Order to Show Cause and Default Order a nullity. Accordingly, the operator’s motion to reopen is moot, and this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Acting Chairman
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Joseph
G. Jacobs
Consultant
Revelation
Energy, LLC
P.O.
Box 249
Stanville,
KY 41659
Ali
Beydoun, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 401
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace