Secretary of Labor v. Revelation Energy, LLC (Commission decision, December 7, 2016)
Secretary of Labor v. Revelation Energy, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2015-410): Holiday closure excused three-day-late penalty contest
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Revelation Energy did not contest an MSHA penalty assessment within the Mine Act's 30-day deadline, so the assessment became a final Commission order on January 26, 2015. The operator said the mine had been closed for several days during the Christmas holiday break, and the Secretary confirmed that Revelation sent its contest form three days after the assessment became final. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged the operator to handle future contests on time. Guided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the Commission reopened the assessment in the interest of justice and remanded for proceedings on the merits, directing the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28
- Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and the case was remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings.
- Key point: A short holiday closure and prompt filing three days after finality supported relief from default when the Secretary did not oppose reopening.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR, :
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA) :
:
: Docket No. KENT 2015-410
v.
: A.C. No. 15-18280-369960
:
REVELATION
ENERGY, LLC :
BEFORE:
Jordan, Chairman; Young, Cohen, and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This matter
arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On April 1, 2015, the Commission received from Revelation Energy, LLC (“Revelation”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc. , 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR , 15 FMSHRC at
- We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the
defaulting party can make a showing of good
cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc. , 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) demonstrate that the proposed assessment was delivered on December 26, 2014, and became a final order of the Commission on January 26, 2015. Revelation asserts that it failed to timely contest the proposed assessment because the mine was closed for several days in December and January during the Christmas holiday break . The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and confirms that the contest form was sent on January 29, 2015, three days after the date of the final order of the Commission. However, the Secretary urges Revelation to ensure that future penalty assessments are contested in a timely manner.
Having
reviewed Revelation’s request
and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young,
Commissioner
/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen,
Jr., Commissioner
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I.
Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Jeffrey
Hoops
Member
Revelation
Energy, LLC
P.O.
Box 249
Stanville,
KY 41659
W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace