Secretary of Labor v. Locust Grove, Inc. (ALJ decision, July 25, 2016)

Secretary of Labor v. Locust Grove, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2015-296): Highwall case settles mid-hearing after the inspector's own testimony wavers

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
KENT 2015-296
Decided
July 25, 2016
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-01

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2016 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2016
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final order, not Commission precedent
This decision by a FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge became the final decision of the Commission 40 days after issuance because the Commission did not direct review (30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1)). It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Locust Grove runs Ben's Branch Mine, a surface coal mine in Perry County, Kentucky. In June 2014 an MSHA inspector reported loose rocks lying or hanging near the crest of an active highwall with three miners working about 10 feet from its base, and found that the shift examination records for the preceding days never noted the rocks. He issued a citation for inadequate examinations and an order for failing to strip loose material from the highwall, marking both as highly likely to cause three fatalities and as reckless disregard. MSHA proposed $178,900 for each. The case went to hearing in Corbin, Kentucky, but during the inspector's direct testimony it became clear he had serious second thoughts about how many miners were affected, how likely injury was, and how culpable management had been. The judge called counsel to a side bar, a recess followed, and the parties returned with a settlement. Judge David F. Barbour approved it: the findings drop to reasonably likely and one person affected, negligence drops from reckless disregard to high, the unwarrantable failure findings stay, and the penalties fall to $7,500 each for a total of $15,000.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 77.1713(a) and 77.1001
  • Outcome: Settlement approved. Gravity reduced to reasonably likely and one person affected, negligence reduced to high, unwarrantable failure retained, penalties cut from $357,800 to $15,000 total.
  • Key point: A proposed penalty is not a fixed number; when the inspector's own testimony at hearing does not support his gravity and negligence findings, the case can resolve on sharply reduced terms.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710

TELEPHONE: 202-434-9958
/ FAX: 202-434-9949

SECRETARY
OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH  

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

LOCUST
GROVE, INC.,

Respondent

CIVIL
PENALTY PROCEEDING:

Docket
No.  KENT
2015-296

A.C.
No. 15-19638-372766

Mine: 
Ben’s Branch Mine

DECISION AND
ORDER

Appearances:               Mary
Sue Taylor, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Nashville, Tennessee, for Petitioner

John
M. Williams, Esq., Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLX, Lexington, Kentucky, for Respondent

Before:                        Judge
David Barbour

In this
proceeding arising under sections 105 and 110 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (“the Act”), 30 U.S.C. §§ 815, 820, the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) on behalf of his Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) petitions for the assessment of civil penalties against Locust Grove, Inc. (“Locust Grove”), a corporation that operates Ben’s Branch Mine, a surface bituminous coal mine located in Perry County, Kentucky.  The Secretary charges Locus Grove with two violations of the Secretary’s mandatory safety standards for surface coal mines, namely 30 C.F.R. § 77.1730(a) and 30 C.F.R. § 77.1001.  Section 77.1713(a) requires a certified person designated by the operator conduct an examination for hazardous conditions in each active working area of a mine at least once during each working shift.  It also requires any hazardous condition to be reported and corrected.[1] Section 77.1001 requires the operator of a surface coal mine to strip loose, hazardous material a safe distance from the top of a highwall.[2]

The Secretary
charges that on June 27, 2014, MSHA Inspector Larry Stubblefield found that Locus Grove failed to strip loose, hazardous material a safe distance from the top of the active highwall at its Ben’s Branch Mine.  The Secretary asserts that Inspector Stubblefield observed numerous rocks of various sizes lying or hanging near the crest of the highwall and saw three miners working approximately 10 feet from its bottom.  The inspector found that the condition was highly likely to result in the miners’ deaths and was a significant and substantial contribution to a mine safety hazard (an “S&S” violation) caused by the company’s reckless disregard and unwarrantable failure to comply with section 77.1101.  In addition, the Secretary charges that the preshift and onshift examination records for the first and second production shifts of June 23, 2014, through the inspection of June 27 did not note the presence of the loose rocks at the top of the highwall, an indication that the examinations were inadequate and therefore in violation of section 77.1713(a).  The inspector found that the inadequate examination were highly likely to result in three fatalities (the same three miners who Inspector Stubblefield saw working within 10 feet of the bottom of the highwall).  The inspector also found the alleged violation was caused by Locust Grove’s reckless disregard and unwarrantable failure to comply with of section 77.1713(a).  Inspector Stubblefield cited the alleged violation of section 77.1713(a) in a citation issued pursuant to Section 104(d)(1) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. §814(d)(1)), and the alleged violation of section 77.1001(a) in an order issued pursuant to the same section of the Act.  The Secretary proposed penalties of $178,900 for each alleged violation.  The Secretary then filed the instant petition seeking assessment of the penalties as proposed.  For its part, the company denied it committed the alleged violations and challenged Inspector Stubblefield’s findings and the Secretary’s penalty proposals.

After Locust
Grove’s answer was received, the Commission’s Chief Judge assigned the case to the court, which in turn ordered counsels to confer to determine if all or part of the case could be settled.  Counsels worked diligently to resolve their differences but were unable to do so.  Therefore, the case went forward as scheduled in Corbin, Kentucky.  At the hearing the Secretary’s counsel stated that the Secretary would call Inspector Stubblefield as a witness.  Counsel for the company stated he would call three management officials.  The Secretary moved that the witnesses be sequestered.  The motion was granted, and the inspector was called to the stand. Tr. 22-23.

The inspector
explained the conditions he found on June 27, 2014, and he stating the reasons why he made his various findings.  However, as his testimony developed, it became clear that the inspector had serious second thoughts about the number of miners affected by the cited conditions, the degree of likelihood that the conditions would result in an injury or injuries, and about management’s degree of culpability for the cited conditions.  Therefore, after counsel for the Secretary finished her direct examination and before counsel for Locust Grove began his cross examination, the court asked counsels to approach the bench for a side bar discussion.  When the discussion concluded a recess was taken and counsels left the court room to continue discussing the case.  Upon their return, counsel for the Secretary announced that counsels agreed to settle the case by modifying the gravity and negligence findings on the citation and order from the conditions making it highly likely three persons would suffer fatal injuries to the conditions making it reasonably likely one person would suffer a fatal injury, and to change the allegations of reckless disregard to high negligence, but to retrain the findings of unwarrantable failure.  Counsel for the Secretary explained that the changes warranted significant reductions in the proposed penalties, to wit $7,500 for each violation. Tr. 72-74.  After the agreement was explained, the settlement was approved on the record by the court. Tr. 74.

ORDER

Citation/Order
No.    Date        30 C.F.R.     Proposed
Penalty    Date

8390397                     
6/27/24     77.1713(a)   $178,900                   $7,500

8390398                     
6/27/24     77.1001       $178,900                   $7,500

The settlement
has been approved (Tr. 74) and within 30 days of the date of this decision the Secretary IS ORDERED to modify Citation No. 8390397 and Order No. 8390398 at line 10 by deleting the “highly likely” findings and making them “reasonably likely,” by deleting the number of persons affected as three and making them one, and at line 11 by deleting the “reckless disregard” findings and making them “high.”  In addition, within the same 30 days, Locust Grove IS ORDERED to pay a civil penalty of $7,500 for each violation, a total of
$15,000.[3] 
Upon modification of the citation and order and payment of the penalties, this proceeding is DISMISSED.

/s/ David F.
Barbour

David F. Barbour

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution: 
(Certified Mail)

Mary
Sue Tyler, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 618 Church Street, Suite 230, Nashville, Tennessee    37219

John
M. Williams, Esq., Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLX, 3151 Beaumont Centre Circle, Suite 375, Lexington, Kentucky    40513

/db

[1] The standard
states:

At
least once during each working shift, or more

often
if necessary for safety, each activing working

area shall be
examined by a certified person designated

by the operator
. . . for hazardous conditions

and any hazardous
conditions noted during such

examinations
shall be corrected by the operator.

[2] The standard
states in pertinent part:

Loose
hazardous material shall be stripped for a

safe
distance from the top of pit[s] or highwalls[.]

[3] Payment shall
be sent to:  The Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Payment Office, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, Missouri     63197-0290.

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace