Secretary of Labor on behalf of Regald Robbins v. Alden Resources, LLC
Secretary of Labor on behalf of Regald Robbins v. Alden Resources, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2014-594-D): Reinstatement tolled during mine shutdown
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2014 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Regald Robbins had been temporarily reinstated at Alden Resources' Mine #3. The company later shut the mine down while it investigated whether enough low-ash coal remained to support further production, laying off Robbins and 43 other miners. Robbins did not oppose tolling the reinstatement order during the shutdown. Judge James G. Gilbert granted tolling effective September 8, 2014 and required the company to report every 30 days on the mine's status. If operations resumed, Robbins had to be returned to his position immediately and could not be displaced by another laid-off miner without good cause.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(2)
- Outcome: Temporary reinstatement was tolled during the shutdown, with monthly reporting and immediate return required if mining resumed.
- Key point: Temporary reinstatement may be paused during a genuine mine-wide layoff, while preserving the miner's priority to return when operations restart.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
1331 PENNSYLVANIA
AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, DC
20004-1710
TELEPHONE:
202-434-9950 / FAX: 202-434-9949
October 2, 2014
SECRETARY
OF LABOR
MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA), on behalf
of
REGALD ROBBINS,
Complainant,
v.
ALDEN
RESOURCES, LLC,
Respondent.
TEMPORARY
REINSTATEMENT PROCEEDING
Docket
No. KENT 2014-594-D
BARB-CD-2014-04
Mine
ID: 15-17691
Mine:
Mine #3
ORDER ON MOTION
TO TOLL TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT ORDER
This
case is before me upon an application for temporary reinstatement pursuant to
section 105(c)(2) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 “(Mine
Act”), 30 U.S.C. § 815(c). On July 28, 2014, I granted the Secretary’s Motion
for Temporary Reinstatement after a hearing conducted in Louisville,
Kentucky on July 22, 2014.
On September 19, 2014, Respondent filed
a Motion to Toll Temporary Reinstatement Order, informing me that the
mine where Complainant is employed is in a temporary shutdown and that while
several personnel remained on the payroll, 44 of the miners, including
Complainant, were informed that they were to be laid off on September 8, 2014.
On September 29, 2014, the Secretary
filed a response to Respondent’s motion stating that the Complainant did not
wish to oppose Respondent’s motion.
On October 2, 2014, I held a telephone
conference with the parties to hear further argument on the motion. Mr. Shelton
explained that the shutdown related to the recent discovery that the mine was
no longer producing low ash coal, and that the temporary shutdown was needed to
determine whether the mine might yield more low ash coal after further
production. The mine is conducting drilling operations to make an assessment as
to the viability of further production. No decision has been made by Respondent
on the likelihood that the mine will return to the production of low ash coal
in the near future. Both Mr. Oppegard and Ms. Gregory represented that
Complainant did not oppose the motion.
As Complainant does not oppose the
motion, Respondent’s Motion to Toll Temporary Reinstatement Order
is GRANTED. The tolling is effective September 8, 2014, and shall
remain in effect until future Order of this Court.
In granting the motion, I HEREBY
ORDER that Respondent file with me a status report on the investigation of
the future production of the mine and any information related to potential
re-opening of the mine every thirty days commencing on November 1,
2014.
If the mine returns to operation at any
time, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Complainant be returned to his position immediately
upon the commencement of operations. Absent good cause, none of the other
miners laid off as the result of the above described action shall take
precedence over Complainant upon the return to mining operations at the mine.
/s/ James G.
Gilbert
James
G. Gilbert
Administrative
Law Judge
Distribution:
(Electronic email)
Billy
Shelton, Esq., Jones, Walters, Turner & Shelton, PLLC, 151 N. Eagle Creek
Drive, Suite 310, Lexington, KY 40509; [email protected]
Angele Gregory, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, 618 Church Street, Suite 230, Nashville, TN 37219; [email protected]
Regald
Robbins, 227 Kent Road, Harrogate, TN 37752
Tony
Oppegard, Esq., P.O. Box 22446, Lexington, KY 40522; [email protected]
Wes
Addington, Esq., Appalachian Citizens Law Center, 317 Main Street, Whitesburg,
KY 41858; [email protected]
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2014, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.