Secretary of Labor v. Redhawk Mining, LLC
Secretary of Labor v. Redhawk Mining, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2012-881): Contest-form mistake excused
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Redhawk Mining sought to reopen an MSHA penalty assessment that had become a final Commission order. Redhawk said it submitted a timely notice of contest but accidentally marked the wrong box and discovered the mistake after receiving MSHA's penalty petition. The Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interests of justice, remanded the case for further proceedings, and directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded for penalty proceedings.
- Key point: A timely contest submitted with the wrong box marked supported unopposed relief from the final assessment.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE
520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
February 12, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
REDHAWK MINING, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. KENT
2012-881
A.C. No. 15-19242-280611-02
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman;
Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006)
(“Mine Act”). On April 19, 2012, the Commission received from Redhawk Mining,
LLC (“Redhawk”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become
a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30
U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine
Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the
Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty
assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty
assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. §
815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen
uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section
105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993)
(“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders,
the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a
final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or
excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its
Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default
is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely
respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits
permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept.
1995).
Redhawk asserts that it filed a
timely notice of contest but mistakenly marked the wrong box. Redhawk discovered
its mistake after receiving the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health
Administration’s (“MSHA”) petition for assessment of civil penalty. The
Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen.
Having
reviewed Redhawk’s request and the
Secretary’s response, in the interests of justice, we hereby reopen this matter
and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings
pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part
2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a
petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order.
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary
Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/
Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/
Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Billy R. Shelton, Esq., Jones
Walters, Turner & Shelton PLLC
151 N. Eagle Creek Drive, Suite 310
Lexington, KY 40509
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2013. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.