FMSHRC Commission decision Docket KENT 2012-749, KENT 2012-904, KENT 2012-1085 Decided October 19, 2017 Citations affirmed

Secretary of Labor v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.

Secretary of Labor v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2012-749, KENT 2012-904, KENT 2012-1085): Split Commission leaves non-S&S findings in place

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2017, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2017
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA challenged an administrative law judge's decision to remove significant-and-substantial designations from a citation under 30 C.F.R. § 77.1001 and an order under 30 C.F.R. § 77.1713(a). The Commission divided evenly on whether substantial evidence supported the judge. Acting Chairman William I. Althen and Commissioner Michael G. Young voted to affirm, while Commissioners Mary Lu Jordan and Robert F. Cohen, Jr. voted to reverse. Because of the tie, the judge's decision remained in place as if affirmed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 77.1001 and 77.1713(a)
  • Outcome: The judge's removal of the significant-and-substantial designations stood as if affirmed.
  • Key point: An evenly divided Commission leaves the administrative law judge's decision in effect.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE
520N

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,                               :

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH                     :

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)                        :     

:

v.
                                                 :          Docket Nos.  KENT
2012-749

:                                KENT 2012-904

:                                KENT 2012-1085                                                                                             
:

NALLY
& HAMILTON ENTERPRISES,        :

INC.                                                                   :

BEFORE: 
Althen, Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

DECISION

BY
THE COMMISSION:

These
proceedings arise under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et. seq. (2012) for violations
of 30 C.F.R § 77.1001 and 30 C.F.R. § 77.1713(a).  At issue is whether
substantial evidence supports determinations made by the Judge in overturning
“significant and substantial” (“S&S”) designations accompanying a citation
and order issued to Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc. by the Department of
Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration.

Acting
Chairman Althen and Commissioner Young vote to affirm the Judge’s decision, while
Commissioner Jordan and Commissioner Cohen vote to reverse the Judge’s
decision.  The
effect of the split decision is to allow the Judge's decision to stand as if
affirmed.  Pennsylvania
Elec. Co. ,
12 FMSHRC 1562 (Aug. 1990), aff’d on other grounds , 969 F.2d 1501 (3d
Cir. 1992).

/s/ William I.
Althen

William
I. Althen, Acting Chairman

/s/
Mary Lu Jordan

Mary
Lu Jordan, Commissioner

/s/ Michael G.
Young

Michael G.
Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen,
Jr., Commissioner

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2017. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.