River View Coal, LLC
River View Coal, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2012-654): Penalty assessment reopened after staffing lapse
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
River View Coal asked the Commission to reopen a penalty assessment that became final before the operator mailed its contest. The mine had been idle over the holidays, its regular clerk was on maternity leave, and temporary staff did not understand the contest deadline. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but warned that future late contests might be opposed. In the interests of justice, the Commission reopened the assessment and remanded it for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28; 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and remanded for proceedings on the merits.
- Key point: A temporary staffing lapse supported reopening here, but the Commission highlighted the need to file future penalty contests on time.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
January 3, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
RIVER VIEW COAL, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. KENT 2012-654
A.C. No. 15-19374-275039
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On March 2, 2012, the Commission received from River
View Coal, LLC (“River”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a
final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed
penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment
is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to
reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a).
Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to
reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief
from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable
by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed
that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause
for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the
merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
The record indicates that the proposed assessment was delivered on December 19, 2011,
and became a final order of the Commission on January 18, 2012. River asserts that it mailed a
notice of contest on January 30, 2012, and received MSHA’s delinquency notice on February 8,
2012. River states that the mine was idle from December 24, 2011 to January 2, 2012.
Moreover, River’s clerk was on maternity leave, and the temporary staff was unaware of the
timely nature of the assessment.
The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, and notes that MSHA received a
payment for the uncontested penalties, by check dated January 20, 2012. The Secretary cautions
that she may oppose future motions to reopen penalty assessments that are not contested in a
timely manner.
Having reviewed River’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interests of justice,
we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further
proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part
2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of
penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Kevin Vaugn
Director of Safety & Training
River View Coal, LLC
835 St., Rte 1179
Waverly, KY 42462
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2013. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.