Secretary of Labor v. Tackett Creek Mining, Inc. (Commission decision, May 30, 2013)
Secretary of Labor v. Tackett Creek Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2012-1569): President's health problems excused late contest
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Tackett Creek Mining missed its penalty-contest deadline while the company's president experienced medical problems during July and August. After returning in September, the president sent the assessment to the company's representative, and MSHA received a late contest dated September 10. The Secretary did not oppose reopening solely because of the president's health problems. The Secretary also urged the operator to ensure future contests were filed on time. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interests of justice and remanded it for penalty proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b) and 2700.28
- Outcome: The final assessment was reopened and remanded, with a penalty petition due within 45 days.
- Key point: The company president's documented health problems during the filing period supported reopening of the late contest.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE
520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
May 30, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
TACKETT CREEK MINING,
INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. KENT 2012-1569
A.C. No. 15-19608-294682
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman;
Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On September 19, 2012, the Commission received from Tackett Creek Mining, Inc. (“Tackett”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In evaluating requests to reopen final section 105(a) orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under which, for example, a party could be entitled to relief from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR, 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).
MSHA’s
record indicates that this proposed assessment was delivered on July 19, 2012, and became a final order of the Commission on August 20, 2012. Tackett asserts that its president suffered medical issues during July and August, and forwarded the assessment to its representative for contest upon his return in September. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, based solely on the president’s health problems. The Secretary notes that MSHA received a late contest dated September 10, 2012. The Secretary urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.
Having
reviewed Tackett’s request and the Secretary’s
response, in the interests of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Mary
Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/
Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/
Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution
Michael D. Clements, Representative
Tackett Creek Mining, Inc.
408 A Manor Drive
Kingsport, TN 37660
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace