Alpha Highwall Mining, LLC and Revelation Energy, LLC, successor in interest v. Secretary of Labor and Secretary of Labor v. Alpha Highwall Mining, LLC and Revelation Energy, LLC, successor in interest (ALJ decision, October 22, 2015)

Alpha Highwall Mining, LLC and Revelation Energy, LLC v. Secretary of Labor (FMSHRC KENT 2012-1207-R, et al.): $5,000 settlement followed safety upgrades

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
KENT 2012-1207-R, KENT 2012-1208-R, KENT 2013-142
Decided
October 22, 2015
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-02

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2015 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Alpha Highwall Mining and its successor, Revelation Energy, proposed settling two citations by reducing a $90,000 penalty to $5,000 and changing both from section 104(d)(1) enforcement actions to section 104(a) citations without unwarrantable failure. Revelation also agreed to spend at least $55,000 on handheld radios, highwall-miner cameras, and miner shelters, and to add the equipment commitments to its ground-control plan. Judge Jerold Feldman initially withheld approval until the company documented the purchases, installation, and plan revisions. After the Secretary confirmed that Revelation had completed those requirements, the Judge approved the settlement, ordered payment of $5,000, and dismissed the consolidated proceedings upon timely payment.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 814(a), 814(d)(1), and 820(i)
  • Outcome: Two citations were modified to section 104(a), the penalty was reduced from $90,000 to $5,000, and the cases were dismissed after documented safety upgrades.
  • Key point: A major penalty reduction may be approved when a successor completes concrete, documented safety improvements that form part of the settlement.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

1331 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Suite 520N

Washington, D.C. 20004

October 22, 2015

ALPHA HIGHWALL MINING, LLC,

and REVELATION ENERGY, LLC,

successor in interest,

Contestant,

v.

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Respondent

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner  

v.

ALPHA HIGHWALL MINING, LLC,

and REVELATION ENERGY, LLC,

successor in interest,

Respondent           

CONTEST PROCEEDINGS

Docket No. KENT 2012-1207-R

Citation No. 8270168; 05/29/2012

Docket No. KENT 2012-1208-R

Citation No. 8270169; 05/29/2012

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

Docket No. KENT 2013-142

A.C. No. 15-19621-301671

Mine: Bucyrus Highwall Miner #76

DECISION
APPROVING SETTLEMENT

AND

ORDER TO PAY

Before:                        Judge Feldman

These consolidated civil penalty and contest proceedings are before me based on a petition for assessment of civil penalty filed by the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) under section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended (“the Act”),   30 U.S.C.
§ 815(d), against the Respondent, Alpha Highwall Mining, LLC (“Alpha Highwall”).

On March 11, 2015, the parties
filed a joint motion to approve settlement naming Revelation Energy, LLC (“Revelation Energy”) as the successor in interest to Alpha Highwall. The parties’ settlement terms included a substantial reduction to the initial proposed civil penalty from $90,000.00 to $5,000.00. The substantial reduction in civil penalty is based, in large part, on the modification of 104(d)(1) Citation No. 8270168 and 104(d)(1) Order No. 8270169 to 104(a) citations, to reflect that the cited conditions were not attributable to unwarrantable failures. In further support of the substantial reduction in civil penalty, Revelation Energy, as the successor in interest to Alpha Highwall, has agreed to implement improved safety measures at the mine site:

In addition to the payment of [the
agreed-upon $5,000.00 civil penalty], [Revelation Energy] by virtue of its acquisition [of Alpha Highwall’s liability], [has] agreed to spend at least
$55,000 to purchase handheld two-way radios, cameras for the highwall miners, and shelters for the miners at [surface] mines operated by Revelation Energy
[some of which were previously-operated by Alpha Highwall]. The handheld radios will be provided to the miners who work at the [surface] mines and the cameras and shelters will be installed on the highwall miners operated by Revelation Energy. [Revelation Energy] has agreed to purchase this equipment, and to install the equipment, at the mines by July 15, 2015. By this date, [Revelation Energy] has also agreed to provide the Secretary with receipts showing that the equipment was purchased. [Revelation Energy] has also agreed to update its ground control plan to specify that the equipment will be purchased and installed by July 15, 2015, and that the equipment will be maintained in good working order thereafter.

Jt. Mot. to Approve Settlement, at
2 (Mar. 11, 2015).

On April 9, 2015, I issued an Order
Holding the Joint Motion to Approve Settlement in Abeyance, 37 FMSHRC 970 (Apr. 2015) (ALJ), contingent upon documented compliance by Revelation Energy of the acquisition and installation of the subject equipment specified in the parties’ settlement terms, as well as the required modification of Revelation Energy’s ground control plan.

On September 30, 2015, the
Secretary filed a Motion for Final Order Approving Settlement asserting that:

Respondent has provided the Secretary
with documentation and evidence demonstrating its implementation of the required cameras, shelters, and two-way radios, and has supplied the necessary revisions to its ground control plan. The Secretary is satisfied with Respondent’s compliance and requests that the administrative law judge approve the joint settlement filed on March 11, 2015.

Mot. for Final Order Approving
Settlement, at 2 (Sep. 30, 2015).

I have considered the
representations and documentation submitted in this matter and I conclude that the proffered settlement is appropriate under the criteria set forth in Section 110(i) of the Act. WHEREFORE, the motion to approve settlement IS GRANTED, and pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Alpha Highwall Mining, LLC, and Revelation Energy, LLC, ARE ORDERED to pay the $5,000.00 civil penalty within 30 days of this Order in satisfaction of the two citations at issue.[1] Upon receipt of timely payment, the captioned matter IS DISMISSED.

/s/ Jerold Feldman

Jerold Feldman

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Anthony M. Berry, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 618 Church Street, Suite 230, Nashville, TN 37219

Charles Bellomy, Esq., Christopher Pence, Esq., Hardy Pence PLLC, 500 Lee Street East,  Suite 701, P.O. Box 2548, Charleston, WV 25329

/acp     

[1]  Payment should be sent to the Mine Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Payment Office, P.O. Box 790390, St. Louis, MO 63179-0390. Please include the Docket No. and A.C. No. noted in the above caption on the check.

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace