FMSHRC Commission decision Docket KENT 2011-858, KENT 2011-1377 Decided November 14, 2012 Remanded

Left Fork Mining Company, Inc.

Left Fork Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2011-858): Timely answers prevented default orders from becoming final

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Two show-cause orders provided that Left Fork Mining would default if it did not answer the Secretary's penalty petitions. Left Fork produced Postal Service tracking records showing that it had timely answered both petitions, and the Secretary confirmed receiving those answers and did not oppose reopening. The Commission held that the default orders never became final because the operator's petition responses were timely. It remanded both cases for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited rules: 29 C.F.R. Part 2700
  • Outcome: The cases were remanded because the default orders had not become final Commission orders.
  • Key point: Proof of timely answers to penalty petitions prevents later conditional default orders from becoming final.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710

November 14, 2012

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) 

v.

LEFT FORK MINING COMPANY, INC.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. KENT 2011-858

A.C. No. 15-12564-250419

Docket No. KENT 2011-1377

A.C. No. 15-12564-261700

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Young and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

These matters arise under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On August 21, 2012, the Commission received from Left
Fork Mining Company, Inc. (“Left Fork”) two motions seeking to reopen two penalty assessment
proceedings and relieve it from the orders of default entered against it.

On August 17, 2011, and March 6, 2012, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued
two Orders to Show Cause which by their terms became Orders of Default if the operator did not
file its answers within 30 days. These Show Cause Orders were issued in response to Left Fork’s
failure to answer the Secretary of Labor’s May 18 and September 7, 2011, Petitions for
Assessment of Civil Penalty.

Left Fork asserts that it timely answered the assessment petitions on May 23, and
September 15, 2011. It submits U.S. Postal Service tracking notifications to that effect. Left
Fork further states that it did not receive the show cause order in Docket No. KENT 2011-858,
and timely answered the show cause order in Docket No. KENT 2011-1377 on April 5, 2012.
The Secretary does not oppose the requests to reopen, and notes that she received Left Fork’s
answers.

Having reviewed Left Fork’s requests and the Secretary’s responses, we conclude that the
Default Orders have not become final orders of the Commission because the operator filed timely
responses to the assessment petitions. Accordingly, these cases are remanded to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the
Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chair

/s/Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

John M. Williams, Esq.

Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLC

3151 Beaumont Centre Circle, Suite 375

Lexington, KY 40513

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N

Washington, D.C. 20004

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2012. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.