Secretary of Labor v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, Inc.
Secretary of Labor v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2011-1354, et al.): late review petition denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Clintwood Elkhorn filed a petition for discretionary review on June 16, 2014, three days after the deadline measured from the Judge's May 14 decision. The Commission held that a May 15 amended decision correcting a clerical error did not restart the 30-day filing period under its procedural rule. It denied the petition as late and stated that the Judge's decision became final 40 days after issuance. The Commission also noted that no two Commissioners would have granted review on the merits.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. §§ 823(d)(1) and 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(c)
- Outcome: The petition for discretionary review was denied as untimely, leaving the ALJ decision to become final under the 40-day rule.
- Key point: A clerical correction in an amended ALJ decision does not restart the deadline for seeking Commission review of the merits.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004-1710
June
20, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
CLINTWOOD ELKHORN MINING
COMPANY, INC.
Docket Nos. KENT 2011-1354
KENT 2011-1385
KENT 2011-1386
ORDER
A petition for
discretionary review was filed by Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company, Inc. on
June 16, 2014. This petition was filed pursuant to section 113(d)(2) of the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2). Section
113(d)(2)(A)(1) of the Mine Act states that a petition for discretionary review
by the Commission may be filed within 30 days after the issuance of the judge’s
decision. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(1).
The judge’s decision
was issued on May 14, 2014. Any petition for discretionary review was due 30
days thereafter, on June 13, 2014. Although the judge filed an amended decision
on May 15, 2014, correcting a clerical error, Commission Procedural Rule 69(c)
states that the issuance of an amended decision correcting a clerical error
shall not toll the time for filing a petition for discretionary review of the
judge’s decision on the merits. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(c). Thus the 30-day time
limit for filing the petition started to run from May 14 (the date of the
initial decision) rather than from May 15 (the date of the amended decision).
The petition for
discretionary review is therefore denied. Consequently, the decision of
Administrative Law Judge Priscilla M. Rae dated May 14, 2014, is final as of 40
days after its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1).[1]
/s/
Mary Lu Jordan
Mary
Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/Michael
G. Young
Michael
G. Young, Commissioner
/s/
Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert
F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/
Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick
K. Nakamura, Commissioner
/s/
William I. Althen
William
I. Althen, Commissioner
Distribution:
Melanie J. Kilpatrick, Esq.
Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLC
3151 Beaumont Centre Circle, Suite 375
Lexington, KY 40513
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Administrative Law Judge Priscilla M. Rae
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004
[1]
Separately, we note that no two Commissioners would have voted to grant the
petition on the merits.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2014. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.