Secretary of Labor on behalf of Thurman Wayne Pruitt v. Grand Eagle Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, November 7, 2011)
Secretary of Labor on behalf of Thurman Wayne Pruitt v. Grand Eagle Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC KENT 2011-1152-D and KENT 2011-1258-D): Reinstatement and discrimination cases dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 2011 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary asked to withdraw temporary-reinstatement and discrimination complaints involving miner Thurman Wayne Pruitt and Grand Eagle Mining. Pruitt agreed to the withdrawal based on a mutually agreeable settlement. Judge Gary Melick permitted the withdrawal under 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11 and dismissed both cases.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
- Outcome: The withdrawal was allowed and both cases were dismissed following settlement.
- Key point: The judge allowed the Secretary to withdraw the complaints after the affected miner agreed to the settlement-based dismissal.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FMSHRC ALJ Decision
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE N. W., SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001
November 7, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR,MSHA,
on behalf of THURMAN WAYNE
PRUITT,
Complainant
v.
GRAND EAGLE MINING, INC.,
Respondent
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT
PROCEEDING
Docket No. KENT 2011-1152-D
MADI-CD-2011-08
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Docket No. KENT 2011-1258-D
MADI-CD-2011-08
Grand Eagle Prep Plant
Mine ID 15-19011
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Appearances: Jennifer Booth Thomas, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Nashville, Tennessee, on behalf of the Secretary;
Tony Oppegard, Esq., Lexington, Kentucky, on behalf of Thurman Wayne Pruitt;
Jeffrey K. Phillips, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson, PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, on behalf of Grand Eagle Mining, Inc.,
Before: Judge Melick
The Secretary requests approval to withdraw her complaint in the captioned cases. The individual miner, who is the subject of the complaint, has also agreed to the withdrawal based on a mutually agreeable settlement. Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is granted. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11.. The cases are therefore dismissed.
/s/
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge
(202) 434-9977
Distribution:(By Certified Mail, and Email)
Jennifer Booth Thomas, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 618 Church Street, Suite 230, Nashville, TN 37219
Tony Oppegard, Esq., P.O. Box 22446, Lexington, Kentucky 40522
Jeffrey Phillips, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson, 1010 Monarch Street, Suite 250, P.O. Box 910810, Lexington, KY 40591-0810
/to
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace