Secretary of Labor v. McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corporation (Commission decision, July 31, 2009)
Secretary of Labor v. McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corporation (FMSHRC KENT 2009-1128 through KENT 2009-1131): Four reopening requests moot after failed delivery
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
McCoy Elkhorn said it never received four proposed penalty assessments. Federal Express records showed unsuccessful delivery attempts on December 26, 2008, when the mine offices may have been closed for the holidays. The Secretary agreed to serve the assessments again and give the operator 30 days after receipt to pay or contest them. The Commission therefore denied the reopening requests as moot.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: Four reopening requests were denied as moot, with the assessments to be re-served.
- Key point: An assessment does not require reopening when initial service failed and the Secretary agrees to re-serve it with a new 30-day response period.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
July 31, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
McCOY ELKHORN COAL CORP.
Docket No. KENT 2009-1128
A.C. No. 15-15138-171766
Docket No. KENT 2009-1129
A.C. No. 15-18250-171772
Docket No. KENT 2009-1130
A.C. No. 15-18721-171781
Docket No. KENT 2009-1131
A.C. No. 15-18775-171784
BEFORE: Duffy, Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On May 26, 2009, the Commission received requests to reopen four penalty assessments issued to McCoy Elkhorn Coal Corporation (“McCoy”) that may have become final orders of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
McCoy states that it never received Proposed Assessment Nos. 000171766, 000171772, 000171781 and 000171784. The Secretary states that Federal Express attempted delivery without success on December 26, 2008, for all four proposed assessments. She suggests that it is possible that the mine offices were closed for the holidays. The Secretary submits that in order to achieve proper service, she will re-serve the proposed assessments by Federal Express at the address of record, and that McCoy will then have 30 days after receipt to either pay or contest the proposed assessments.
Having reviewed McCoy’s requests and the Secretary’s response, we deny McCoy’s requests to reopen as moot. The Secretary may proceed as she has outlined in her response, and, if any of the proposed penalties are contested by McCoy, this case shall proceed pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. See Lehigh Cement Co., 28 FMSHRC 440, 441 (July 2006).
______
Michael F. Duffy, Chairman
______
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
______
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
______
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Melanie J. Kilpatrick, Esq.
Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLC
2333 Alumni Park Plaza, Suite 310
Lexington, KY 40517
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace