Conshor Mining, LLC (Commission decision, March 23, 2012)

Conshor Mining, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2008-562 and KENT 2008-782): Flagrant-violation review vacated as moot

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
KENT 2008-562, KENT 2008-782
Decided
March 23, 2012
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-03

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An ALJ certified for interlocutory review whether a violation that was not reckless could still be classified as flagrant based on an operator's history of similar violations. The Commission granted review and ordered briefing. The Secretary then withdrew the flagrant classifications for the three violations, making the certified question moot. The Commission granted the Secretary's unopposed motion, vacated its order granting review, and remanded the cases to the ALJ for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 820(b)(2) and 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76(a)(1)(i)
  • Outcome: The interlocutory review order was vacated as moot and the cases were remanded.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of the challenged flagrant classifications eliminated the live issue before the Commission.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

March 23, 2011

SECRETARY OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH 

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), 

v.

CONSHOR MINING, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. KENT 2008-562

Docket No. KENT 2008-782

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006). On January 19, 2012, Administrative Law Judge Jerold Feldman issued a Certification of Interlocutory Ruling pursuant to Commission Procedural Rule 76, 29 C.F.R. § 2700.76(a)(1)(i). In his order, the judge certified for interlocutory review by the Commission his ruling in his Order of November 28, 2011, that a violation that is not attributable to reckless conduct may not be deemed flagrant under 30 U.S.C. § 820(b)(2) based on the operator’s history of prior similar violations. Unpublished Order at 2-3 (Jan. 19, 2012). On February 15, 2012, we issued an order granting review of the Judge’s order of November 28, 2011, with regard to that issue and ordered briefing.

On March 6, 2012, the Commission received from the Secretary of Labor a motion to vacate the Commission’s February 15 order. As grounds for the motion, the Secretary states that she no longer seeks assessment of the three violations at issue as “flagrant” violations. The Secretary submits that, consequently, the issue directed for review by the Commission is moot. The Commission has received no opposition from Conshor Mining, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Secretary’s motion, it is granted. We hereby vacate our February 15 order granting review. This case is remanded to Judge Feldman for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

/s/ Michael F. Duffy

Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner

/s/Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution

Jeffrey K. Phillips, Esq.

Steptoe & Jhonson, PLLC

1010 Monarch Street, Suite 250

Lexington, KY 40513

Edward Waldman, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Administrative Law Judge Jerold Feldman

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace