Secretary of Labor v. Webster County Coal, LLC (Commission decision, December 14, 2009)
Secretary of Labor v. Webster County Coal, LLC (FMSHRC KENT 2008-167): Default review petition denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2009, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A Chief Administrative Law Judge entered default after Webster County Coal failed to answer a penalty petition or respond to a show-cause order that the record showed it had received. Webster later moved to reopen, arguing only that it had no record of receiving the original proposed assessment. The Commission treated the motion as a timely petition for discretionary review. The company did not address the default order, explain its failure to respond to the show-cause order, or reconcile its claim with the fact that a penalty petition followed an earlier contest. The Commission therefore denied review.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b) and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The petition for discretionary review of the default order was denied.
- Key point: A party seeking review of a default must address the default and the documented missed filings, not only dispute receipt of an earlier assessment.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
December 14, 2009
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
WEBSTER COUNTY COAL, LLC
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. KENT 2008-167
A.C. No. 15-02132-129470
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 2, 2009, the Commission received from Webster County Coal, LLC (“Webster”) a motion seeking to reopen a proposed penalty assessment that had allegedly become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
On April 13, 2009, Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick issued a show cause order to Webster because Webster had failed to file an answer to a petition for penalty assessment sent to it by the Secretary of Labor on December 28, 2007. In the show cause order, the judge stated that Webster would be found in default if it did not file an answer or show good cause for not doing so within 30 days of the order. The record shows that Webster received the Order to Show Cause on April 16, 2009. On November 3, 2009, Chief Judge Lesnick issued an order finding that Webster had failed to respond to the show cause order and entering a judgment by default for the Secretary.
On December 2, 2009, the Commission received the motion to reopen from Webster. The motion did not provide reasons regarding why the company had not answered the petition for penalty assessment nor responded to the show cause order. It instead asserted that the operator had no record of receiving the proposed assessment. In her response to the motion, the Secretary opposed the granting of Webster’s request because it does not address any basis for vacating the Chief Judge's default order.
The Chief Judge's jurisdiction in this matter terminated when his default order was issued on November 3, 2009. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission's procedural rules, relief from a judge's decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). We construe the motion from Webster to be a timely filed petition for discretionary review.
The petition for discretionary review filed by Webster does not address the validity of the Chief Judge's default order nor provide any reasons why the default order should be vacated. The operator also does not address why it failed to address the show cause order when the record specifically indicates its receipt. In addition, Webster does not indicate how the Secretary had issued a petition for the assessment of civil penalty if Webster had not first contested the initial proposed assessment, which it now claims not to have received. On these grounds, we hereby deny the petition.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Deanna L. Talwalkar, Esq.
Rajkovich, Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLC
2333 Alumni Park Plaza, Suite 310
Lexington, KY 40517
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Myra James, Chief
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace