Matter of Michael Vernon THOMAS and Matter of Joseph Lloyd THOMPSON, Respondents (agency decision, May 28, 2019)

Matter of Michael Vernon THOMAS and Matter of Joseph Lloyd THOMPSON (BIA ID 3954): Attorney General referred conviction-vacatur questions

Decision type
agency decision
Docket
ID 3954
Decided
May 28, 2019
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable agency precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-28
Official source

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable agency precedent from 2019, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2019
The standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later agency or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final BIA decision
This published precedent is a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under the Board's Policy Manual, Chapter 1.4(d), an order issued by the Board is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, the Attorney General, or a federal court, and it is effective as of its issuance date unless the order provides otherwise. This is a published precedent decision, not an unpublished party-only disposition.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official agency release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release

Plain-English summary

The Attorney General referred two Board decisions for review of how a judicial change to a criminal conviction or sentence should affect the immigration consequences of that conviction. The referral covers changes labeled vacatur, modification, clarification, or another term. The Board’s decisions were automatically stayed while the Attorney General reviewed the issue. The order invited briefing from the parties and interested amici and set deadlines for opening and reply briefs.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i)
  • Outcome: The Attorney General referred the two Board decisions for review and stayed them pending review.
  • Key point: The order asks when a judicial alteration of a criminal conviction or sentence should control its immigration consequences.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 556 (A.G. 2019) Interim Decision #3954

     Matter of Michael Vernon THOMAS, Respondent
     Matter of Joseph Lloyd THOMPSON, Respondent
             Decided by Attorney General May 28, 2019

                     U.S. Department of Justice
                    Office of the Attorney General


             BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i), I direct the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) to refer these cases to me for review of its decisions. The Board’s decisions in these matters are automatically stayed pending my review. See Matter of Haddam, A.G. Order No. 2380-2001 (Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me, I invite the parties to these proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs that address whether, and under what circumstances, judicial alteration of a criminal conviction or sentence—whether labeled “vacatur,” “modification,” “clarification,” or some other term—should be taken into consideration in determining the immigration consequences of the conviction.
The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on or
before June 28, 2019. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000 words on or before July 12, 2019. The parties may submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before July 12, 2019. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to [email protected], and in triplicate to:

                 United States Department of Justice
             Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114
                   950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                        Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.

                                   556

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace