Matter of Castillo-Perez (agency decision, December 3, 2018)

Matter of Castillo-Perez (BIA ID 3947): Attorney General review and briefing ordered

Decision type
agency decision
Docket
ID 3947
Decided
December 3, 2018
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable agency precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-27
Official source

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable agency precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later agency or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final BIA decision
This published precedent is a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under the Board's Policy Manual, Chapter 1.4(d), an order issued by the Board is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, the Attorney General, or a federal court, and it is effective as of its issuance date unless the order provides otherwise. This is a published precedent decision, not an unpublished party-only disposition.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official agency release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release

Plain-English summary

The Acting Attorney General directed the Board of Immigration Appeals to refer a respondent's case for review. The order requested briefing on the standard for determining good moral character in a cancellation-of-removal application and on the effect of multiple driving-under-the-influence convictions on moral character and discretionary relief. It set word limits, filing deadlines, and service instructions for the parties and interested amici. The order did not decide those questions or resolve the respondent's underlying immigration claims.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(f) and 1229b(b); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i)
  • Outcome: The case was referred to the Attorney General for review, briefing was ordered, and no merits issue was resolved in this order.
  • Key point: The order framed the issues for Attorney General review and invited briefing, but it did not decide the respondent's cancellation-of-removal claims.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 495 (A.G. 2018) Interim Decision #3947

          Matter of CASTILLO-PEREZ, Respondent
       Decided by Acting Attorney General December 3, 2018

                      U.S. Department of Justice
                     Office of the Attorney General


       BEFORE THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL

Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i), I direct the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) to refer this case to me for review of its decision. The Board’s decision in this matter is automatically stayed pending my review. See Matter of Haddam, A.G. Order No. 2380-2001 (Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me in my review, I invite the parties to these proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs on points relevant to the disposition of this case, including:

   1. In connection with an application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229b(b), what is the appropriate legal standard for determining when an individual lacks “good moral character” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)?
2. What impact should multiple convictions for driving while intoxicated or
driving under the influence have in determining when an individual lacks “good moral character” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)?
3. What impact should multiple such convictions have in determining whether
to grant discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)?

The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on or

before January 4, 2018. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000 words on or before January 18, 2019. The parties may submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before January 18, 2019. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to [email protected], and in triplicate to:

                     United States Department of Justice
                 Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114
                       950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                            Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.

                                    495

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace