Matter of L-E-A- (agency decision, December 3, 2018)

Matter of L-E-A- (BIA ID 3946): family-based persecution issue referred for review

Decision type
agency decision
Docket
ID 3946
Decided
December 3, 2018
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable agency precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-27
Official source

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable agency precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later agency or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final BIA decision
This published precedent is a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under the Board's Policy Manual, Chapter 1.4(d), an order issued by the Board is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, the Attorney General, or a federal court, and it is effective as of its issuance date unless the order provides otherwise. This is a published precedent decision, not an unpublished party-only disposition.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official agency release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release

Plain-English summary

The Acting Attorney General directed the Board of Immigration Appeals to refer a respondent's case for review. The order asked the parties and interested amici to brief whether an alien may establish persecution based on membership in a particular social group defined by a family unit. It also set word limits, filing deadlines, and filing instructions. The order did not decide the asylum-law question or resolve the respondent's underlying claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i)
  • Outcome: The case was referred to the Attorney General for review, briefing was ordered, and no merits issue was resolved in this order.
  • Key point: The order framed a family-based particular-social-group question for Attorney General review without deciding the respondent's asylum claim.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 494 (A.G. 2018) Interim Decision #3946

                   Matter of L-E-A-, Respondent
       Decided by Acting Attorney General December 3, 2018

                      U.S. Department of Justice
                     Office of the Attorney General


       BEFORE THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL

Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i), I direct the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) to refer this case to me for review of its decision. The Board’s decision in this matter is automatically stayed pending my review. See Matter of Haddam, A.G. Order No. 2380-2001 (Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me in my review, I invite the parties to these proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs on points relevant to the disposition of this case, including:

Whether, and under what circumstances, an alien may establish persecution on account of membership in a “particular social group” under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1101(a)(42)(A) based on the alien’s membership in a family unit.

The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on or

before January 4, 2019. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000 words on or before January 18, 2019. The parties may submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before January 18, 2019. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to [email protected], and in triplicate to:

                     United States Department of Justice
                 Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114
                       950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
                            Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.

                                   494

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace