In re C-Y-Z-, Applicant (Board decision, December 1, 2004)

In re C-Y-Z-, Applicant (BIA ID 3503): Attorney General declined review

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
ID 3503
Decided
December 1, 2004
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-28

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2004, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2004
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final BIA decision status
This official Attorney General order is final as an order denying certification for review. The underlying Board decision was not altered by this order.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Attorney General considered a request to certify the Board of Immigration Appeals decision for review. The Attorney General denied that request. The order therefore left the Board decision unchanged.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(h)(1)(iii) (2002), now addressed through 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)
  • Outcome: The request for Attorney General review was denied.
  • Key point: The Attorney General declined to certify the Board decision for review.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 693 (A.G. 2004)
Interim Decision #3503

In re C-Y-Z-, Applicant
Decided by Attorney General December 1, 2004 Decided by Board June 4, 19971
U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals

FOR APPLICANT: Yee Ling Poon, Esquire, New York, New York

FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
(December 1, 2004)

The request of the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to certify for review the captioned decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(h)(1)(iii) (2002)2 is denied.

1
The Board’s June 4, 1997, decision in this case was published as Matter of C-Y-Z-, 21 I&N Dec. 915 (BIA 1997). 2 On March 1, 2003, the functions of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) were transferred from the Department of Justice to the Department of Homeland Security. See Homeland Security Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135 (2002). The Executive Office for Immigration Review, however, remains in the Department of Justice. On February 28, 2003, the Attorney General published a technical rule that moved 8 C.F.R.
§ 3.1(h) to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h). See Aliens and Nationality; Homeland Security; Reorganization of Regulations, 68 Fed. Reg. 9824, 9830 (Feb. 28, 2003). In addition, the authority of the INS Commissioner to refer decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals to the Attorney General is now vested in the Secretary of Homeland Security or in “specific officials of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary with the concurrence of the Attorney General.” Id. at 9832 (to be codified at 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.1(h)(1)).

693

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace