Matter of Elly Velez Pamatong (agency decision, November 9, 1979)

Matter of Elly Velez Pamatong (BIA ID 2743): permission to represent persons denied

Decision type
agency decision
Docket
ID 2743
Decided
November 9, 1979
Outcome
Other
Precedential status
Citable agency precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-30
Official source

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable agency precedent from 1979, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1979
The standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later agency or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final BIA decision
This published precedent is a final decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under the Board's Policy Manual, Chapter 1.4(d), an order issued by the Board is final unless and until it is stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, the Attorney General, or a federal court, and it is effective as of its issuance date unless the order provides otherwise. This is a published precedent decision, not an unpublished party-only disposition.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official agency release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: The agency released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release

Plain-English summary

The Board considered a Philippine national and refugee's application for permission to represent people before the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Board. The applicant was a graduate of the University of the Philippines Law Program and wanted to practice for compensation. The Board held that a person seeking to practice as an attorney must meet the same qualifications as an attorney, including qualification as a member of a bar under 8 C.F.R. § 1.1(f). Because the applicant did not meet that requirement, the Board disapproved the application.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 8 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 and 1.1(f)
  • Outcome: The application for permission to represent persons was disapproved.
  • Key point: A refugee or resident alien seeking to practice before the Board for compensation must satisfy the same attorney qualification requirements as other applicants.

Full text (BIA official public release)

                                                       Interim Decision #2743



                MATTER OF ELLY VELEZ PAMATONG

        Application for Permission to Represent Persons
               Pursuant to Title 8, Section 292.1,
              of the Code of Federal Regulations
                Decided by Board November 9, 1979

(1) Under 8 C.F.R. 292.1, only certain designated individuals are authorized to represent persons before the Board and the Service. Included in this category are attorneys as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). (2) In the case of an individual who is an alien, the provisions of 8 C.F.R. 292.1 apply equally to resident aliens and refugees, and thus the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees are complied with. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relat- ing to the Status of Refugees, an alien refugee who is a graduate of the Philippines Law Program is denied permission to practice before the Board since he is not within any of the categories specified in 8 C.F.R. 292.1(d). ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Pro se By: Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Appleman, Maguire, and Farb, Board Members

The applicant desires permission to represent persons before the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Board of Immigra- tion Appeals. He is a native and citizen of the Philippines and a graduate of the University of the Philippines Law Program. He is considered a refugee by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, although from the information provided by the applicant, his present status in the United States is not specified. Under the provisions of 8 C.F.R. 292.1, only certain designated individuals are authorized to represent persons before the Service and the Board. Included in this category are attorneys as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). Law students and law graduates not yet admitted to the bar are also authorized under certain circumstances to represent persons. In addition, certain reputable individuals, appearing at the request of the person involved, may represent that person. The final category of individuals who may represent persons includes those who have been accredited by the Board as representatives of recognized organizations. The applicant here wishes to practice before the Board and the
175
Interim Decision #2743
Service for compensation. To do this, he must meet the same qualifica- tions as any individual desiring to function as an attorney. This means that he must qualify as a member of a bar as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). This requirement would appear to conform to the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, cited by the applicant, as it is applicable to all who wish to practice before the Board and the Service, resident aliens and refugees alike. Since the applicant here is not an attorney within the meaning of 8 C.F.R. 292.1 as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f), his application must conse- quently be disapproved. ORDER. The application is disapproved.

                              176

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace