Matter of Elly Velez Pamatong (agency decision, November 9, 1979)
Matter of Elly Velez Pamatong (BIA ID 2743): permission to represent persons denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable agency precedent from 1979, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Board considered a Philippine national and refugee's application for permission to represent people before the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Board. The applicant was a graduate of the University of the Philippines Law Program and wanted to practice for compensation. The Board held that a person seeking to practice as an attorney must meet the same qualifications as an attorney, including qualification as a member of a bar under 8 C.F.R. § 1.1(f). Because the applicant did not meet that requirement, the Board disapproved the application.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: 8 C.F.R. §§ 292.1 and 1.1(f)
- Outcome: The application for permission to represent persons was disapproved.
- Key point: A refugee or resident alien seeking to practice before the Board for compensation must satisfy the same attorney qualification requirements as other applicants.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #2743
MATTER OF ELLY VELEZ PAMATONG
Application for Permission to Represent Persons
Pursuant to Title 8, Section 292.1,
of the Code of Federal Regulations
Decided by Board November 9, 1979
(1) Under 8 C.F.R. 292.1, only certain designated individuals are authorized to represent persons before the Board and the Service. Included in this category are attorneys as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). (2) In the case of an individual who is an alien, the provisions of 8 C.F.R. 292.1 apply equally to resident aliens and refugees, and thus the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees are complied with. (3) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relat- ing to the Status of Refugees, an alien refugee who is a graduate of the Philippines Law Program is denied permission to practice before the Board since he is not within any of the categories specified in 8 C.F.R. 292.1(d). ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Pro se By: Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Appleman, Maguire, and Farb, Board Members
The applicant desires permission to represent persons before the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Board of Immigra- tion Appeals. He is a native and citizen of the Philippines and a graduate of the University of the Philippines Law Program. He is considered a refugee by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, although from the information provided by the applicant, his present status in the United States is not specified. Under the provisions of 8 C.F.R. 292.1, only certain designated individuals are authorized to represent persons before the Service and the Board. Included in this category are attorneys as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). Law students and law graduates not yet admitted to the bar are also authorized under certain circumstances to represent persons. In addition, certain reputable individuals, appearing at the request of the person involved, may represent that person. The final category of individuals who may represent persons includes those who have been accredited by the Board as representatives of recognized organizations. The applicant here wishes to practice before the Board and the
175
Interim Decision #2743
Service for compensation. To do this, he must meet the same qualifica- tions as any individual desiring to function as an attorney. This means that he must qualify as a member of a bar as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f). This requirement would appear to conform to the provisions of Article 19 of the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, cited by the applicant, as it is applicable to all who wish to practice before the Board and the Service, resident aliens and refugees alike. Since the applicant here is not an attorney within the meaning of 8 C.F.R. 292.1 as defined in 8 C.F.R. 1.1(f), his application must conse- quently be disapproved. ORDER. The application is disapproved.
176
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace