Matter of M/T "Dona Rita" (Board decision, July 30, 1976)

Matter of M/T "Dona Rita" (BIA ID 2508, 1976): fine cancelled because vessel was abroad

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 2508, NYC-10/52.3953
Decided
July 30, 1976
Outcome
Vacated
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-13
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1976, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1976
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final BIA decision
The Board sustained the carrier's appeal and cancelled the fine. Under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7), a Board order is final when issued unless stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, Attorney General, or a federal court.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A crewman bound for the M/T "Dona Rita" arrived in New York to transfer to the vessel in Trinidad. After learning that the ship was outside the United States, British Airways notified the carrier, which took custody of the crewman; he later absconded. Immigration officials imposed a $1,000 fine on the carrier for failing to detain him aboard the ship. The Board held that the cited provision did not apply because the vessel was outside the United States and was not expected there. It sustained the appeal and cancelled the fine.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: INA § 254(a)(2)
  • Outcome: Carrier's appeal sustained; $1,000 fine cancelled.
  • Key point: The vessel's absence from the United States defeated this crewman detention fine.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #2508

MATTER OF M/T "DONA RITA"
In Fine Proceedings
NYC-10/52.3953

Decided by Board July 30, 1976
(1) Alien crewman arrived in New York via British Airways and was inspected and admitted into the United States as an alien in transit without a visa enroute to his vessel which was docked in Trinidad. Since his vessel was not in New York, he was taken into custody there by the vessel's owners, and subsequently absconded. The Service then instituted these fine proceedings against the vessel pursuant to section 254(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. (2) Section 254(a)(2) of the Act is directed against the carrier which, having brought an alien crewman to the United States, fails to detain him on board the vessel after he has been refused a landing permit. Since the M/T "Dona Rita" was not in the United States and was not expected to be in the United States, the fine proceedings were unproperly instituted and the fine will be cancelled. In re: M/T "DONA RITA"; alien crewman involved: Asadulo Hogue

Basis for Fine: Act of 1952—Section 254(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1284]. ON BEHALF OF CARRIER: John C. Lane, Esquire Freehill, Hogan & Mahar
21 West Street
New York, New York 10006

The Acting District Director in New York imposed a fine of $1,000 upon the carrier, with regard to the vessel M/T "Dona Rita," for a violation of section 254(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and, in a decision dated October 14, 1975, he denied a request for cancellation of the fine. The carrier has appealed from that decision. The appeal will be sustained and the fine will be cancelled. Section 254(a)(2) of the Act provides in pertinent part as follows: "The owner, agent, consignee, charterer, master or commanding officer of any vessel or aircraft arriving in the United States from any place outside thereof who fails . . . (2) to detain any alien crewman on board the vessel . . . after such inspection [as set out in section 254(a)(1)] unless a conditional permit to land has been granted such alien crewman . . . shall pay to the collector of customs of the customs district in which the port of arrival is located or in which the failure to comply with the orders of the officer occurs the sum of $1,000 for each alien crewman in respect of whom any such failure occurs." (Emphasis supplied.) 718
Interim Decision #2508
The record shows that an alien, a citizen of Bangladesh, was hired in Bangladesh as a crewman on the M/T "Dona Rita," which was docked in Trinidad. A ticket was purchased for him from Bangladesh to New York on British Airways. According to the carrier, the alien was to be flown from New York to Trinidad where he would join the vessel. Upon arrival in New York he was inspected and admitted as an alien in transit without visa through the United States. In his decision of October 14, 1975 the Acting District Director states that it was the understanding of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and British Airways that the M/T "Dona Rita" was in New York. Upon learning that the vessel was not in New York, British Airways notified the carrier in New York, who thereupon took custody of the alien. The alien subsequently absconded and the Service insti- tuted these proceedings. Section 254(a)(2) is directed against the carrier which, having brought an alien crewman to the United States, fails to detain him after he is refused a landing permit. Since the M/T "Dona Rita" was not in the United States and was not expected to be in the United States, fine proceedings under section 254(a)(2) were improperly instituted. Accord- ingly, the appeal will be sustained and the fine will be cancelled. ORDER: The appeal is sustained; the fine is cancelled.

719

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace