Matter of Mody (Board decision, October 31, 1975)

Matter of Mody (BIA ID 2460, 1975): student employment request denied for lack of economic necessity

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 2460, A-21028909
Decided
October 31, 1975
Outcome
Other
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-13
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1975, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1975
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS decision
The District Director denied the student's application for permission to accept part-time employment. This published decision disposes of the request before that official. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A community college student asked to work part time, citing the cost of buying a car to commute to school. His application listed $2,915 from his father and $3,755 in annual expenses. Earlier applications showed that his brother had offered room, board, and school expenses and that a brother-in-law had also offered support. The District Director found no evidence that this assistance had ended. He denied the request because the student had not shown economic necessity caused by an unforeseen change in circumstances. This is recorded as an application denial, rather than review of an earlier order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(6)
  • Outcome: Application for part-time employment denied.
  • Key point: The student did not show that the family support previously offered was unavailable.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #2460

MATTER OF MODY

Application for Permission to Accept Employment A-21028909
Decided by District Director October 31, 1975 Application by a nonimmigrant student for permission to accept part-time employment under the provisions of 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6) is denied for failure to establish economic necessity for such employment due to unforeseen circumstances arising subsequent to his acquisition of student status in the absence of evidence to show that there is no longer available to applicant the support provided by his brother for room and board and school expenses, or a brother-in-law's offer of support, as indicated in a previous application.

The applicant is an unmarried twenty-three-year-old citizen of India whose status was adjusted from visitor to that of a nonimmigrant student on August 29, 1973. He is presently attending Erie County Community College in Buffalo, New York, where he is enrolled in a Management Engineering technology course. His temporary stay has been extended on a regular basis, and he is now authorized to remain until December 8, 1975. On June 20, 1975, he applied for permission to accept employment. He states that he is receiving $2,915 from his father in India; and that his yearly expenses are $1,350 for school fees, $1,440 for room and board,
$125 for books and stationary, and $840 for auto payments and insur- ance. His total expenses are $3,755. The subject bases his application on his desire to complete purchase of an automobile in order to commute to school, which he claims is very difficult during winter months. The applicant in his application acknowledged the question regarding em- ployment in the United States but did not indicate whether he had or had not been employed. In a previous application for permission to work, and the application for change of status, it was shown that the applicant's brother would furnish him with room and board and school expenses amounting to approximately $2,400 to $3,000 a year. Another sponsor, a brother-in- law, also offered to support the applicant. On August 7, 1975, the applicant was interviewed by a Service officer, and he admitted that he had been employed as a stockboy in a super- 542
Interim Decision #2460

market since May 11, 1975. A previous application for permission to work in 1974 was denied. The applicant has accepted unauthorized employment. 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6) provides, in part, that if a student requests permis- sion to accept part-time employment because of economic necessity, he must establish that the necessity is due to unforeseen circumstances arising subsequent to change to student classification. In reviewing the record, it is noted that the applicant was receiving approximately $3,000 a year from his brother and is now receiving $2,915 from his father and has a brother-in-law who also offered his support. There is no evidence or information in the record showing that this assistance is no longer available to him. The applicant has failed to establish a need for part-time employment as required by Service regulations. The application must, therefore, be denied. ORDER: It is ordered that the application for part-time employment because of economic necessity be and is hereby denied.

543

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace