Matter of Kashri (Board decision, September 16, 1975)

Matter of Kashri (BIA ID 2431, 1975): student's employment request denied for lack of financial need

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 2431, A-19391793
Decided
September 16, 1975
Outcome
Other
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-13
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1975, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1975
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS decision
The District Director denied the student's application for permission to accept employment. This published decision disposes of the request before that official. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A university student sought permission to work after his tuition rose. His application listed $3,350 in annual expenses and $3,800 in support from parents and other family members. His earlier transfer application and his uncle's sponsorship also indicated that he had sufficient support. The District Director found that he had not shown economic necessity arising from an unforeseen change in financial circumstances and denied the employment request. This is recorded as an application denial, rather than review of an earlier order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(6)
  • Outcome: Application for permission to accept employment denied.
  • Key point: The student's reported family support exceeded his annual expenses despite the tuition increase.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #2431

MATTER OF KASHRI
Application for Permission to Accept Employment A-19391793
Decided by District Director September 16, 1975 Application by a nonimmigrant student for permission to accept parttime employment under the provisions of 8 CFR 214.2(f)(6) is denied for failure to establish economic necessity for such employment due to unforeseen circumstances arising subsequent to his acquisition of student status where the application reveals that his income for the year from his parents and other family members exceeds his total annual expenses for tuition, board, and incidental expenses.

The applicant is a male native of Iran and citizen of Israel who was admitted to the United States on July 11, 1971 as a visitor for pleasure. He was subsequently granted a change of nonimmigrant status to that of a student in order to complete his high school education. On August 5, 1974 he was permitted to transfer to Fairleigh Dickinson University and he was granted subsequent extensions of stay until June 30, 1975. He now seeks permission to accept employment. In his application the alien shows that his need for employment is based upon an increase in tuition at Fairleigh Dickinson University from
$66 a credit to $75 a credit. The annual tuition was $2,084, and with the increase, it will be $2,300. The applicant's additional yearly expenses are $850 for board, and $200 for other expenses, thus totalling $3,350 for the year. His sources of income for the year are shown as $2,300 from parents in Israel, $900 from family members and $600 given to him by his brother. His total income for the year will be $3,800. The subject's prior application for permission to transfer indicated that he had sufficient finances to support himself during the entire period of his studies. His sponsor, an uncle, stated that he would fully support the subject, and the alien's own statements indicated that his income was sufficient to meet his expenses. A review of the application reveals that the alien's present income is more than sufficient to meet his needs. Therefore, the alien has failed to establish that there is a need for employment due to economic necessity which has arisen as a result of an unforeseen change in financial cir- cumstances since his status was changed to that of a nonimmigrant student. ORDER: It is ordered that the application for permission to accept employment be denied.
457

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace