Matter of You Fu Wang (Board decision, May 16, 1975)
Matter of You Fu Wang (BIA ID 2381, 1975): short deportation order required remand
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1975, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An immigration judge ordered a respondent deported and denied his request for voluntary departure using a short form order. The form said the respondent had made no application for relief, although the record showed that he had requested voluntary departure to earn money for his trip. The Board held that the short form could be used only when no such application was made or when voluntary departure was granted. It remanded the record for the immigration judge to enter a proper order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: INA §§ 241(a)(2) and 244(e); 8 C.F.R. §§ 242.17 and 242.18(b).
- Outcome: Remanded for entry of a proper order.
- Key point: Denial of a voluntary departure request required a proper order rather than a short form stating that no relief had been requested.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #2381
MATTER OF You Fu WANG
In Deportation Proceedings
A-16007602
Decided by Board May 16, 1975
On appeal from the immigration judge's denial of voluntary departure, using the short form I-38 order, the record is remanded for the entry of a proper denial order. A summary decision on form I-38 is permitted only if the alien makes no application under 8 CFR 242.17, or if the alien applies for voluntary departure under section 244(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and such relief is granted. CHARGE: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)]—Entered after being re- fused permission to land temporarily as a crewman, in violation of section 252(a).
ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: David W. Walters, Esquire 100 Biscayne Blvd., North
Suite 1001
Miami, Florida 33182
This is an appeal from an order of an immigration judge finding the respondent deportable as charged and directing his deportation to Taiwan. The record will be remanded to the immigration judge for further proceedings. The record indicates that the respondent, through counsel, applied for a grant of sufficient voluntary departure to enable him to earn money to depart at his own expense. This application was denied by the immigration judge using summary order Form I-38. The immigration judge erred in entering the deportation order on the short Form I-38, which states that "Respondent has made no applica- tion for relief from deportation." We note that the immigration judge predicated his request for counsel's consent to a "short form" order, on the finding "the respondent has made no application for relief from deportation because he is unable to show that he has funds. . . ." (Tr. P. 8). A summary decision on Form I-38 or I-39 is permitted only if the alien makes no application under section 242.17 or if he applies for voluntary departure only and the immigration judge grants the applica- tion. The action here was in violation of 8 CFR 242.18(b), and a remand 297
Interim Decision #2381
is required for the entry of a proper order by the immigration judge. Accordingly, the following order will be entered. ORDER: The record is remanded to the immigration judge for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion.
298
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace