Matter of Duncan (Board decision, April 21, 1975)
Matter of Duncan (BIA ID 2373, 1975): Liberian legitimation supported son's visa petition
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1975, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A lawful permanent resident from Liberia appealed the denial of a visa petition for his son, Maxwell Duncan. The district director had found that Maxwell did not qualify as a child because the petitioner had never married Maxwell's mother. The petitioner supplied a Liberian court order legitimating Maxwell, a birth registration, and another court order identifying the parents and allowing Maxwell to join his father in the United States. The Board found that the legitimation met Liberian law and that Maxwell qualified as a child under the immigration statute. It sustained the appeal and approved the petition.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: INA §§ 101(b)(1)(C) and 203(a)(2); Liberian Code of Laws, title 18, § 530.
- Outcome: District director's denial reversed; visa petition approved.
- Key point: The Liberian court's legitimation order established the beneficiary's status as a child for the visa petition.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #2373
MATTER OF DUNCAN
In Visa Petition Proceedings
A-20657788
Decided by Board April 21, 1975
On appeal, petitioner seeks the approval of a visa petition to accord his son preference classification under section 203(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The appeal is sustained and the petition is approved because beneficiary was shown to have been legitimated under the laws of Liberia as established by: (1) a certified copy of the court order of legitimation (while the beneficiary was under age 18), (2) a certified copy of the registration of the beneficiary's birth, and (3) a court order certifying petitioner as the natural father of the beneficiary. ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Donald Garfinkle, Esquire 3111 Cadillac Tower
Detroit, Michigan 48226
This is an appeal from an order of the district director denying a visa petition to accord the beneficiary status as an immediate relative pur- suant to section 203(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as the child of a lawful permanent resident of the United States. The visa petition was denied on the ground that an illegitimate child cannot qualify as a child under the Immigration and Nationality Act unless legitimated under the law of the father's or child's residence or domicile and the child is in the legal custody of the legitimating parent at the time of such legitimation. The appeal will be sustained. The petitioner, a native of the Republic of Liberia, is a permanent resident of the United States. He filed a petition to classify the status of his alien relative for issuance of an immigrant visa. The beneficiary is a native and citizen of the Republic of Liberia, born October 24, 1958, male. The petitioner has acknowledged that he has never married the beneficiary's natural mother. He contends, however, that he has legiti- mated the child under the Liberian Code of Laws. He has submitted (1) a certified copy of an order of the Probate Court, Montserrado County, Republic of Liberia, dated May 30, 1974, legitimating the petitioner's illegitimate child, Maxwell Duncan, (2) a certificate of registration of birth of Maxwell Duncan, National Health Service, Republic of Liberia, and (3) an order of the Judicial Branch, Territorial Court, Bomi Territ- 272
Interim Decision #2373 ory, Republic of Liberia, dated December 28, 1973, certifying that the petitioner and Mary Debar are the natural parents of Maxwell Duncan, that Mary Debar has given her consent for Maxwell Duncan to join his father in the United States, and the court granted Maxwell Duncan permission to join his father in the United States. We have carefully reviewed the record and examined the court order legitimating the beneficiary. We are satisfied that the legitimation of the beneficiary conforms with the requirements of Title 18, Liberian Code of Laws of 1956, section 530.¹ It is concluded that under Title 18, section 530, Liberian Code of Laws (1956), the beneficiary in this case has been legitimated and qualifies as a child within the meaning of section 101- (b)(1)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The appeal will be sustained. ORDER: The appeal is sustained, and the visa petition is approved.
¹ See Liberian Supreme Court's decision in Prout v. Cooper, 5 Liberian Law Reports 412 (1937).
273
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace