Matter of Manalo (Board decision, July 3, 1974)
Matter of Manalo (BIA ID 2302, 1974): departure did not withdraw admission application
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1974, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An applicant appealed an exclusion order based on findings that he had obtained a visa by misrepresenting material facts and lacked an immigrant visa. While the appeal was pending, he departed the United States and sought to withdraw his application for admission. The Board distinguished withdrawing an appeal from withdrawing the admission application: the latter required permission and would let him depart without an exclusion order. It found no reason to grant that permission and returned the record to the Service.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: INA §§ 212(a)(19), 212(a)(20); 8 C.F.R. § 3.4
- Outcome: Withdrawal of admission application denied; record returned to Service.
- Key point: Departure during an exclusion appeal did not give the applicant a right to withdraw his admission application.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #2302
MATTER OF MANALO
In Exclusion Proceedings
A-19257498
Decided by Board July 3, 1974
Request for permission to withdraw his application for admission, made following the entry of an exclusion order and during the pendency of appeal to the Board, is denied an applicant found excludable on the ground he obtained his visa by misrepresenting material facts. EXCLUDABLE: Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(19) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(19)]—Procured visa by misrepresenting material facts.
Act of 1952—Section 212(a)(20) [8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(20)]—Immigrant alien not in possession of immigrant visa.
ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT: Dan F. Danilov, Esquire 3828 Seattle-First National Bank Building Seattle, Washington 98154
During the pendency of this appeal from an exclusion order, appli- cant's counsel wrote us under date of June 5, 1974 that the applicant "has requested departure from the United States on June 5, 1974 and he has arranged to pay for the transportation costs out of his own funds." Enclosed was a request for dismissal of the appeal "for the reason that the applicant wishes to withdraw his Application for Admission into the United States and return to the Republic of the Philippines as soon as possible." We are informed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service that the applicant departed from the United States on June 5, 1974. There is a marked difference between withdrawl of an appeal, which under 8 CFR 3.4 leaves the original exclusion order in effect to the same extent as if no appeal had been taken, and withdrawal of an application for admission. If permission is granted by the immigration judge or this Board to withdraw the application for admission, the alien departs without being excluded. The alien may not, without leave and as a matter of right, withdraw his application for admission, Matter of Vargas-Molina, 13 I. & N. Dec. 651 (BIA, 1971). On this record, we see no reason to permit withdrawal of the application for admission. ORDER: The record is returned to the Service without further action by the Board.
4
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace