Matter of University of California (Board decision, July 24, 1968)
Matter of University of California (INS ID 1895, 1968): visiting geologist petition approved
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1968, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The University of California petitioned to bring geologist Brian H. Baker to the United States to conduct faculty seminars on the East African rift system. The District Director found that his specialized knowledge and geology work in Kenya met the distinguished merit and ability requirement. He also found that Baker maintained a foreign residence and that the proposed faculty seminars were temporary services requiring his expertise. He approved the classification petition as an initial decision, with no earlier ruling under review.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: Former INA § 101(a)(15)(H)(i).
- Outcome: University petition approved for temporary visiting professor classification.
- Key point: A visiting professor's specialized seminars were temporary services within the cited classification provision.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #1895
MATTER OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
In Visa Petition Proceedings
SFR—N-7711
Decided by District Director July 24, 1968
A visiting geology professor of distinguished merit and ability coming to the United States for 8 months as a regent's professor to conduct facility seminars in a field of geology in which he possesses specialized knowledge, is coming to perform "temporary services" within the meaning of section 101(a) (15) (H) (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Discussion : The University of California has submitted a petition to accord Brian H. Baker classification under section 101(a) (15) (H) (i). The University wishes to bring the beneficiary to the United States for a period of three months as a regent's professor to conduct faculty seminars in geology as it particularly relates to the East African rift system. There are five basic requirements for approval of a petition to ac- cord a. beneficiary a classification under section 101(a) (15) (H) (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Three requirements relate to the beneficiary and two to the services it is proposed that he perform. As to the beneficiary, he must be :
(1) An alien having a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning;
(2) Of distinguished merit and ability; and (3) Coming to the United States temporarily to perform services of an exceptional nature.
As to the services, they must be :
(1) Of an exceptional nature requiring the special merit and ability of the beneficiary; and
(2) Temporary.
Mr. Brian is presently employed as a professor of geology by the University of East Africa, University College, Nairobi, Kenya. He received the bachelor of science with honors degree in geology from the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, on July 2, 1949. From 1949 to 1962, he was employed by the Government of
838
Interim Decision. #1895
Kenya as a geologist. During that time he participated in the Mount Kenya Expedition during the international geophysical year. In 1962 he was the chief geologist involved in the geological survey of Kenya. In 1963 he served as Commissioner of Mines in geology, Ministry of Natural Resources, Government of Kenya. Mr. Brian is of distin- guished merit and ability. Evidence has been presented that he has no intention of abandoning his residence or position abroad. Mr. Brian will provide the permanent faculty members with benefits of his studies of the East African rift system and his experience as a geologist and Commissioner of Mines for the Government of Kenya. In this regard his duties may be readily distinguished from those of the permanent faculty member. It is concluded that the duties speci- fied in the petition of the University of California require Mr. Brian's specialized knowledge and background and are temporary within the meaning of the applicable statute. The petition will be approved. ORDER: It is ordered that the petition to classify the beneficiary under section 101(a) (15) (H) (i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act be and is hereby approved.
839
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace