Matter of Martinez-Monteagudo (Board decision, April 11, 1968)

Plain-English summary

A Cuban applicant sought permanent resident status under the Act of November 2, 1966. Although he had been inspected and admitted as a visitor several times after January 1, 1959, his last entry in 1961 was without inspection. The Regional Commissioner held that the Act required him to be in the United States following an inspected admission or parole. His earlier visitor admissions and later grant of voluntary departure did not satisfy that requirement. The Commissioner affirmed the District Director's denial of the application.

Decision snapshot

• Cited authorities: Section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1966; Matter of Riva, Interim Decision No. 1691.
• Outcome: District Director's denial of adjustment affirmed; application denied.
• Key point: Earlier inspected visits did not overcome an uninspected last entry for adjustment under the cited Act.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1851

MATTER OF MARTINEZ-MONTEAGUDO
In Adjustment of Status Proceedings
A-12406533
Decided by Regional Commissioner April 11, 1968
A native and citizen of Cuba who last entered the United States illegally, having

entered without inspection on March 28, 1961, is ineligible for adjustment
of status under section 1, Act of November 2, 1966, notwithstanding he had on
prior occasions subsequent to January 1, 1959 been inspected and admitted into the United States [Matter of Riva, Int. Dec. No. 1691, distinguished.]

Discussion: This case comes forward by certification from the District Director, Miami, Florida, who denied the application on the grounds that the applicant last entered the United States without inspection and is, therefore, ineligible for the benefits sought. The applicant claims to be a native and citizen of Cuba, born in Santa Clara, Las Villas, Cuba, on August 8, 1923. He last entered the United States illegally near Brownsville, Texas, on March 28, 1961, with the express intent of evading inspection in that area and proceeding to Miami, Florida. He was, on April 10, 1961, at Miami, Florida, granted an indefinite period of time within which to depart voluntarily from the United States. Records of this Service indicate the applicant was inspected and admitted into the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor on July 19, 1960, and departed on July 26, 1960. He was again admitted in the same status on August 6, 1960; departed August 13, 1960; admitted September 28, 1960, and departed January 24, 1961. There is nothing in the record to indicate that he was other than a bona fide visitor on the occasions of those visits to the United States, nor that he was then a refugee from Cuba. In fact, the record indicates that he returned directly to Havana after at least the first two visits. Section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1966, provides, in part, that the status of any alien who is a native or citizen of Cuba and who has been inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States subsequent to January 1, 1959, and has been physically present in the United States for at least two years, may be adjusted by the Attorney 688

Interim Decision #1851
General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may
prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, if the alien makes an application for such adjustment and the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence. Upon approval of such an application for adjustment of status, the Attorney General shall create a record of the alien's admission for permanent residence as

of a date thirty months prior to the filing of such an application or
the date of his last arrival into the United States, whichever date is
later.

In the Matter of Riva, Interim Decision No. 1691, the Regional
Commissioner found that adjustment of status under the law in
question here could be based on the alien's first inspection and admission or parole into the United States subsequent to January 1, 1959, notwithstanding a subsequent arrival after a temporary absence from the United States with no intention on the part of the applicant to abandon residence in the United States. The case before us is distinguished from Riva, in that Riva, after a temporary absence, was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States and was in the country pursuant to such inspection and admission when her

status was adjusted. Our applicant evaded inspection and entered
illegally when he last arrived and is now in the United States pursuant to that illegal entry. Section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1966, clearly contemplates the adjustment of status of an alien who is in the United States pursuant to inspection and admission or parole into the United States. The grant of indefinite voluntary departure to the applicant did not constitute an inspection and admission or parole. Since he is in the United States pursuant to an illegal entry, he is not eligible for adjustment of status and the decision of the District Director will be approved. ORDER: The decision of the District Director, Miami, Florida, is affirmed and the application is denied.

689