Matter of Bienkowski (Board decision, November 7, 1966)

Matter of Bienkowski (BIA ID 1680, 1966): experienced economist qualified without a degree

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1680, A-17018948
Decided
November 7, 1966
Outcome
Other
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1966, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1966
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS decision
The District Director approved the beneficiary's visa petition for preference classification as an economist. This published decision disposes of the request before that official. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

An economist sought professional visa preference classification even though he had never received a university degree. He had studied economics, worked in market research and planning since 1954, and become chief economist for a group of companies that wanted to transfer him to Washington, D.C. The Department of Labor certified the position and advised that he was a qualified member of the professions. The District Director found that his education and extensive work experience established professional qualifications despite the missing degree. He approved the petition. This was an initial approval, rather than review of an earlier order.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: Immigration and Nationality Act §§ 101(a)(32), 203(a)(3), and 212(a)(14); 8 C.F.R. § 204.2(f).
  • Outcome: Visa petition approved for preference classification as an economist.
  • Key point: Extensive, progressively responsible economics work supported professional qualification without a degree.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1680

MATTER OF BIENKOWSKI

In Visa Petition Proceedings
A-17018948
Devided by District Director November 7, 1966 Notwithstanding beneficiary has never received a degree in economics from an institution of higher learning, he is a qualified economist, and as such a mem- ber of the professions within the meaning of section 101(a) (32) of the Immi- gration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 89-236, on the basis of his undergraduate studies in economics, his work history since 1954 in the field of economics and related activities culminating in his appointment as chief economist for a large corporation, and an advisory opinion from the Depart- ment of Labor that he is a qualified member of the professions; therefore, a visa petition is granted to accord him preference classification under section 203 (a) (3) of the Act, as an economist.

The beneficiary was born on August 27, 1926, in Warsaw, Poland, and is a citizen of Canada, presently residing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The beneficiary, although never having been issued a degree from an accredited institution of higher learning, is an economist specializing in marketing and marketing management. On February 11, 1966, the beneficiary filed a petition in Washington, D.C. under section 203 (a) (3) of the Act to accord himself that prefer- ence classification as a member of the professions. Section 203(a) (3) of the Act provides in part that visas shall be made available "to quali- fied members of the professions." Section 101(a) (32) of the Act states that "the term 'Profession' shall include but not be limited to archi- tects, engineers, lawyers, physicians, surgeons, and teachers in elemen- tary or secondary schools, colleges, academies, or seminaries." Volume I of the Third Edition of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, published by the United States Department of Labor, contains the following definition: "Economist (professional and kindred) 050.088. economic analyst. Conducts research, prepares reports, and formulates plans to aid in solution of economic problems arising from production and distribution of goods and services: Devises methods for collecting and processing economic and statistical data, and com- piles, organizes, and interprets such data. Advises private industrial 17
Interim Decision #1680
concerns or Government agencies on matters, such as operating effi- ciency, marketing methods, and fiscal problems." A commonly accepted criterion for determining whether an occu- pation falls within the meaning of the term "profession" is whether the occupation realistically requires the attainment of an education equivalent at least to a baccalaureate degree in the United States, as a prerequisite to the performance of the duties thereof. The beneficiary has never been issued any degree from an institution of higher learn- ing; however, he has had considerable employment experience in his field. The issue, therefore, is whether he may be properly considered as being a qualified member of the professions despite his lack of any diploma or degree and whether such qualification may be based upon the combination of his educational achievement and work experience. The beneficiary's education and employment experience are sum- marized as follows: he attended the University of St. Andrews in Scotland between 1947 and 1950 and passed general M.A. examina- tions in Polish, Moral Philosophy and Economics and a special exam- ination in Political Science. He also attended the University of Lon- don and in 1962 passed preliminary examinations for a baccalaureate in economics but did not take the final examination scheduled two years later in 1964. Additionally, he was enrolled in the Institute of Business Administration of the University of Toronto, Canada, and completed an evening conference series course in marketing methods. At the latter two institutions his work consisted of extension course type of study. Mr. Bienkowski was employed by the T. Eaton Company, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, a large chain of department stores, from 1954 to 1963 and rose from the position of market research analyst to that of Divisional Research Manager of the General Buying and Merchandis- ing Division. From 1963 to February 1966, the beneficiary was employed by Levy Industries Limited, Toronto, Canada, a large manufacturing and automotive concern where he initially held the position of Corporate Facilities Planner, Corporate Division. On Feb- ruary 1966 he commenced employment with Canadian Cane Equipment Limited, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, one of a group of Anglo-Cana- dian companies, as chief economist. It is this group of companies which now wishes to transfer the beneficiary to the position of chief economist with one of their affiliates, Cane Commodities (Caribbean) Limited, a Bermuda chartered corporation, with offices in Washing- ton, D.C. His first employer has pointed out that the beneficiary progressed from a Research Analyst to the management level during his career with that company. The second employer states that he discharged

18
Interim Decision #1680 conscientiously and well all responsibilities assigned to him and has attached position descriptions reflecting the relatively high level of importance of the beneficiary's duties and responsibilities. The posi- tion which he has now attained with his present employers and their desire to transfer him to the United States as chief economist are factors which further strengthen the evidence of his qualifications as a professional economist. The beneficiary states that he holds membership in five professional associations, including the Economists' Forum of the Canadian Manu- facturers' Association, the Directorship of the Toronto Chapter of the American Marketing Association, 1963 to 1965, and the Canadian In- dustrial Management Association. The beneficiary's employment his- tory evidences a continued ascent in the importance of the posts to which he has been assigned and in the scope of his responsibilities in the field of economics. The Department of Labor, upon consultation by the Service, in accordance with Part 204.2(f), Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, issued a certification under section 212(a) (14) of the Act on August 30, 1966, and an advisory opinion that the beneficiary is qualified as a member of the professions. After careful consideration of all the foregoing, the Service agrees with the opinion expressed by the Department of Labor and has de- termined that, because of the beneficiary's extensive employment ex- perience and high level of occupational attainment, notwithstanding his lack of academic achievement, he is a member of the professions and qualifies for the issuance of an immigrant visa under section 203 (a) (3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Accordingly, the petition will be approved. It is ordered that the petition be and is hereby approved.

19

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace