Matter of Konishi (Board decision, September 2, 1966)

Matter of Konishi (BIA ID 1644, 1966): proposed assistant did not qualify for treaty trader status

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1644, A-14805378
Decided
September 2, 1966
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1966, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1966
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS decision
The Regional Commissioner dismissed the appeal from the denial of the change of nonimmigrant classification. This published decision resolves that application before the Regional Commissioner. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Japanese visitor applied to change her classification to treaty trader so she could work for a Japanese owned import and export company in New York. The company called the proposed position an executive assistant and said her Japanese language skills were essential. The Regional Commissioner found no definite evidence that she would perform supervisory or executive work, and no documents showing her education or employment background for such work. He also found that a title change and language ability alone did not prove the special qualifications required for employment in a minor capacity. He dismissed the appeal from the denial of her application.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: INA §§ 101(a)(15)(E)(i) and 248; 22 C.F.R. § 41.40.
  • Outcome: Denial of treaty trader classification upheld; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: A proposed job title and Japanese language ability alone did not establish executive duties or the special qualifications required by the regulation.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1644

MATTER OF KONISHI

In Section 248 Proceedings
A-14805378

Decided by Regional Commissioner September 2, 1966

Application for change of nonimmigrant classification under section 248, Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, from visitor for pleasure to that of treaty trader under section 101(a)(15)(E)(i) of the Act, as executive assistant to an assistant vice president of a Japanese-owned import-export business, is denied since it has not been established, as required by 22 CFR 41.40, that applicant will be performing duties of a supervisory or executive nature; no documentary evidence as to her educational and employment background has been submitted to substantiate her qualifications to perform such duties; the mere designation of the position as “executive assistant” rather than “secretary” does not establish the employment is to be other than in a “minor capacity,” and it cannot be found solely by reason of applicant's knowledge of Japanese that she has “special qualifications” as contemplated by the regulations.

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from the denial of the application for change of nonimmigrant status.

The appellant is an unmarried Japanese subject, born August 31, 1937, at Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. She was admitted to the United States at Honolulu, Hawaii, on April 27, 1966, as a temporary visitor for pleasure until July 27, 1966. The instant request for change of nonimmigrant classification to that of a treaty trader was filed by her on June 24, 1966. There has been submitted with the application a letter dated June 20, 1966, from the Comptroller of Kanematsu New York, Inc., a Japanese-owned concern, which states that the applicant will be employed as secretary to the assistant vice president whose duty is to supervise the export and import of the firm's metals department to and from Japan; that it is felt because of her knowledge of Japanese and training in general business, she will be of great assistance.

The application was denied by the District Director on July 28, 1966, on the ground that the nature of the alien's proposed employment does not satisfy the requirements for treaty trader status. It has been asserted on appeal that Kanematsu New York, Inc., is one of the largest treaty-trader Japanese firms in New York City; that it averages more than $100,000,000 per year in gross business volume; that the concern has many departments among which are those for textiles, machinery, metals, grain, foodstuffs, cameras, seeds, petroleum, woolen piece goods, raw materials and various other merchandise; that each department requires a sizeable staff of executive personnel, including not only a manager but assistants as well to handle the large volume of business; that the term “secretary” is not intended to mean a simple office worker; that the alien's ability to use Japanese is highly essential to the company's operation; that she is a specialist who is needed as executive assistant to the assistant vice president in charge of the metals department.

To be eligible for change of nonimmigrant status to that of a treaty trader, the applicant must meet the requirements of section 101(a)(15)(E)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as well as § 41.40 of Title 22, Code of Federal Regulations. In this connection, the applicable regulations require, in part, that:

... he will be engaged in duties of a supervisory or executive character, or, if he is or will be employed in a minor capacity, he has special qualifications that will make his services essential to the efficient operation of the employer's enterprise and will not be employed solely in a manual capacity.

In the matter at hand, no definitive information has been furnished to show that the duties which the appellant will be called upon to perform actually are of a supervisory or executive nature. Additionally, no documentary evidence has been submitted with regard to her educational and employment background to substantiate that she is qualified to function on such level. The mere designation of the position to be filled as that of an “executive assistant” rather than a “secretary” does not satisfactorily establish that she will be employed other than in a minor capacity. It cannot be found solely by reason of her knowledge of Japanese that she has the “special qualifications” contemplated by the regulations as being necessary to her employer's operations. This appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and same is hereby dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace