Matter of Martinez-Torres (Board decision, October 16, 1964)

Matter of Martinez-Torres (BIA ID 1411): permission to reapply for admission denied

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1411, A-6618013
Decided
October 16, 1964
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1964, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1964
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Regional Commissioner dismissed the appeal and left the denial of permission to reapply for admission in place. This published decision was issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, not the Board of Immigration Appeals.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Mexican citizen appealed the denial of his request for permission to reapply for admission after deportation. He had been convicted under a federal law concerning marijuana and had been deported in 1962. The Regional Commissioner found that the conviction made him mandatorily inadmissible under the immigration law then in effect. Because permission to reapply would not overcome that bar, the Commissioner upheld the discretionary denial and dismissed the appeal.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: Immigration and Nationality Act §§ 212(a)(17) and 212(a)(23)
  • Outcome: Denial of permission to reapply affirmed; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: Permission to reapply would serve no purpose where another ground made the applicant mandatorily inadmissible.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1411

MATTER OF MARTINEZ-TORRES

Application for PERMISSION TO REAPPLY

A-6618013

Decided by Regional Commissioner October 16, 1964

Application for permission to reapply for admission, pursuant to section 212(a)(17), Immigration and Nationality Act, is denied, in the exercise of discretion, to an alien convicted of a law relating to illicit traffic in marijuana (26 U.S.C. 4744(1)), since he is mandatorily excludable from the United States under section 212(a)(23) of the Act and no purpose would be served in granting the application.

This case is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from the District Director's decision denying the application as a matter of discretion.

The applicant is a 51-year-old male, a native and citizen of Mexico. He is married to a native and citizen of Mexico who resides in Mexico. The applicant has no children.

The applicant was last deported from the United States on January 2, 1962 at El Paso, Texas under the provisions of section 241(a)(11) of the Immigration and Nationality Act in that “he at any time has been convicted of a violation of any law or regulation relating to the illicit traffic in marihuana. (26 U.S.C. 4744(1)).” The record in this case contains a record of criminal proceedings wherein the applicant was convicted and sentenced in the United States District Court at El Paso, Texas for violation of 26 U.S.C. section 4744(1), in that he was a transferee of a quantity of marijuana without paying the tax thereon as required by law, and as a result of such conviction was on December 15, 1961 sentenced by the court to a term of two years imprisonment, and the execution of the sentence was suspended for a period of two years, the defendant (applicant) being placed on probation for that term.

As the applicant is mandatorily inadmissible to the United States under the provisions of section 212(a)(23) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as one who has been convicted of a law relating to the illicit traffic in marijuana (26 U.S.C. 4744(1)), no purpose would be served in granting his application for permission to reapply for admission into the United States. Accordingly, the District Director's action in denying the application as a matter of administrative discretion was proper and the appeal will be dismissed.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace