Matter of Buckland (Board decision, April 28, 1964)

Matter of Buckland (BIA ID 1388): visitor's request for student status denied

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1388, A-13289860
Decided
April 28, 1964
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1964, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1964
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Regional Commissioner dismissed the appeal from the District Director's denial of a change from visitor to student status. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Jamaican visitor applied to change to student status for a fashion design course with twelve class hours each week. The District Director doubted that she was a full-time student and concluded she sought to prolong her stay. On appeal, the Regional Commissioner examined her lack of disclosed income or assets, the cost of the course, and her reliance on a cousin whose ability to support her was uncertain. The Commissioner also noted that she had shown no earlier interest in dress design and had completed her purpose of visiting a friend. He denied the change of status as a matter of discretion and dismissed the appeal.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act § 248.
  • Outcome: Denial of change from visitor to student status upheld; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: The applicant's uncertain financial support and the circumstances of her proposed course did not warrant a discretionary change of status.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1388

MATTER OF BUCKLAND

In SECTION 248 Proceedings

A-13289860

Decided by Regional Commissioner April 28, 1964

Application under section 248, Immigration and Nationality Act, for change of nonimmigrant status from visitor to that of student is denied, in the exercise of discretion, to a 49-year-old mother of 4 children who has no disclosed income or assets of her own; who has enrolled in a 12-class hours per week course in designing at an estimated cost of $2,500 per annum; and who, for maintenance, tuition and expenses (except for any undisclosed support received from her husband in Jamaica) is dependent upon her cousin who is under no legal obligation to support her, and concerning whom considerable doubt exists as to whether his income and assets are adequate for him to assume the burden of supporting the applicant in the United States.

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from the decision of the District Director at New York, who has denied the applicant's request for change of status from that of a visitor to that of a student on the ground that since she attends classes for only twelve hours per week and there is no extensive outside study, she is not a full-time student. Additionally, he has concluded that the nature of the applicant's schooling, her age, the time she has been in the United States as a visitor, her hours of attendance at school and the affidavits of support, indicate that Mrs. Buckland is only attempting to prolong her stay in the United States.

The applicant is a citizen of Jamaica who was born on March 22, 1915 at Portland, Jamaica. She was admitted to the United States on June 15, 1963, at New York, New York, as a visitor to August 14, 1963. An extension of stay was granted to her on August 2, 1963 for the period up to November 14, 1963 and she was advised that this was her final extension. On October 7, 1963 her application for change of status was received in the New York office, together with the completed certificate of eligibility from the Mayer School of Fashion Design, which indicated that the applicant had enrolled in a course in designing, the cost of which was estimated at $2,500 per annum.

The present application indicates Mrs. Buckland is married, and that her husband resides in Kingston, Jamaica. This application has not been completed in the space provided for the names and ages of the children, but the applicant's prior request for an extension of stay was completed to show that she has four children.

The applicant has also presented (1) an affidavit of support dated September 12, 1963 and completed by Roy George Whitelock, her cousin; (2) a statement by Cute Miss Coats Inc. dated September 25, 1963 reciting the employment of Roy Whitelock at earnings of $85 per week and (3) a statement on the stationery of Paragon Progressive Federal Credit Union dated October 4, 1963 and reciting the existence of a share (savings) account in which Roy Whitelock has a balance of $1,222.14. A further letter from the Mayer School of Fashion Design dated October 26, 1963 has been submitted by the applicant which advises that Mrs. Lillian Buckland was enrolled in a designing course; that she attends twelve class hours per week and will devote five to ten hours per week to her homework. Counsel, during oral argument in support of this appeal, has furnished a letter from the Mayer School of Fashion Design in which the attendance of the applicant at this school since October 6, 1963 is acknowledged. It also advises that her course of study will continue to February 7, 1965.

The record in this case, including the argument submitted by counsel in connection with his appeal, has been carefully reviewed. The applicant is a 49-year-old mother of four children, who has no disclosed income or assets of her own and is dependent, except for what contributions she may receive from her husband, after maintaining himself and their four children, upon Roy Whitelock for maintenance, tuition and expenses. No evidence has been submitted as to the amount of support which she receives from her husband. It is also noted that her cousin is under no legal obligation to support her and there is considerable doubt as to whether his income and assets are adequate for him to assume the burden of supporting the applicant in the United States. The applicant's desire to engage in an educational program in dress designing has not been manifested in any way prior to her application for change in status. She came to the United States to visit a friend and has accomplished this purpose. Under all of the circumstances present in this proceeding, it is concluded that her request for a change of status does not, as a matter of discretion, warrant approval.

It is ordered that this appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace