Matter of Lewis (Board decision, March 23, 1964)

Matter of Lewis (BIA ID 1374): prior illegal entries warranted denial of permission to reapply

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1374, A-11341677
Decided
March 23, 1964
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1964, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1964
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Acting Regional Commissioner dismissed the appeal in the order below. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A British Honduran citizen sought permission to apply again for admission as a visitor after two deportations. He had twice tried to enter by claiming U.S. citizenship and had been convicted for unlawful entry and attempted entry after deportation. The Acting Regional Commissioner agreed that this history did not warrant a favorable exercise of discretion and dismissed his appeal. If a pressing medical need later arose, he could seek consideration of temporary admission with a nonimmigrant visa application.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act §§ 212(a)(17), 212(d)(3).
  • Outcome: Denial of permission to reapply upheld; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: Repeated unlawful entries and deportations supported denial as a matter of discretion.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1374

MATTER OF LEWIS

Application for PERMISSION TO REAPPLY

A-11341677

Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner March 23, 1964

Because of his past convictions and deportations for illegal entry upon a false claim of U.S. citizenship, applicant is denied permission to reapply for admission, pursuant to section 212(a)(17), Immigration and Nationality Act, in the exercise of discretion since his temporary admission under the provisions of section 212(d)(3) of the Act may be considered in connection with an application to a United States consul for a nonimmigrant visa should a pressing need for medical treatment for himself or some other member of his family require him to come to the United States at some future time.

The case is on appeal from the denial of the application by the District Director at Chicago. The District Director denied the application on the ground that the applicant's past immigration record does not warrant favorable exercise of the discretion to grant the application.

The applicant, 37 years old, married, a native and citizen of British Honduras, who was deported from the United States on October 1, 1957, desires to reenter the United States as a visitor. On appeal, he states that he would like to know that if sickness should occur in his family or among his wife and children, he would be in a position to bring them to the United States for any sort of medical treatment not available in his country.

The applicant first entered the United States on July 31, 1944 as an agricultural worker. He was reported on October 15, 1946 to be absent without leave from the Department of Agriculture Holding Center. He was apprehended on the same day and he departed voluntarily to British Honduras under safeguards on November 1, 1946.

On October 14, 1956 the applicant entered the United States at San Ysidro, California without inspection by claiming to be a United States citizen. He was apprehended on September 4, 1957. He was convicted in the United States District Court, San Diego, California on September 23, 1957 for entering the United States in that unlawful manner. He was sentenced to imprisonment for four months but execution of the sentence was suspended and he was placed on probation for five years on condition that he remain outside the United States. He was deported from the United States on October 1, 1957. The record shows that he entered the United States on October 14, 1956 to seek employment and to reside.

On July 4, 1960 he arrived at the port of San Ysidro, California and attempted to enter the United States again by claiming to be a United States citizen. He was paroled into the United States for prosecution. He was convicted in the United States District Court, San Diego, California on July 18, 1960 of illegally attempting to enter the United States after deportation. He was sentenced to imprisonment for two months for that offense. He was committed at the same time for an additional four months for the crime of which he had been convicted on September 23, 1957, and for which he had been placed on probation. He was given a hearing in exclusion proceedings on November 16, 1960 and was ordered excluded and deported as an immigrant without a visa. The record shows that he attempted to enter the United States on July 4, 1960 for the purpose of working in this country in order to support his wife and children who were residing in British Honduras, and he was deported on December 17, 1960 pursuant to the exclusion order.

On July 27, 1962 he arrived at the port of New Orleans with a visitor's visa and was paroled into the United States for a hearing before a special inquiry officer. He was instructed to report to the New Orleans office on July 30, 1962 and then to the Chicago office on or before August 6, 1962. After a sworn statement was taken from him in Chicago on August 6, 1962, he was released pending further notice to appear for a hearing. The notice sent to him on August 21, 1962 to appear for a hearing on August 28, 1962 was returned undelivered since he was not known at the address he gave. After an extensive investigation to locate him, his departure to British Honduras on December 18, 1963 was verified.

We agree with the District Director's decision to deny the application. Should a pressing need for medical treatment for himself or some other member of his family require him to come to the United States temporarily at some future time, the matter of authorizing his temporary admission under the provisions of section 212(d)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act may be considered in connection with his application to a United States consul for a nonimmigrant visa.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace