Matter of Esposito (Board decision, April 15, 1964)

Matter of Esposito (BIA ID 1372): unlawful entry barred a reentry permit

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1372, A-5804401
Decided
April 15, 1964
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1964, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1964
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Regional Commissioner affirmed the district director's denial and dismissed the appeal in the order below. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

An Italian citizen sought a reentry permit after leaving the United States to join his wife in Italy. His own statements and a port document showed that he had entered unlawfully as a deserting crewman and had lived in the United States without lawful status. The Regional Commissioner held that a permit under section 223 required lawful admission for permanent residence. Because he had never received that status, the Commissioner affirmed the denial and dismissed his appeal.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act § 223.
  • Outcome: Reentry permit denial affirmed; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: An unlawful entrant who was never admitted for permanent residence could not obtain a returning resident's reentry permit.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1372

MATTER OF ESPOSITO

In SECTION 223 Proceedings

A-5804401

Decided by Regional Commissioner April 15, 1964

An alien who unlawfully entered this country and remained here in an illegal status is ineligible for a permit to reenter the United States under section 223, Immigration and Nationality Act, since he has not been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.

This case is here for consideration of the appeal from the denial of the application for a permit to reenter the United States as provided in section 223 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The District Director, Cleveland, Ohio, denied the application on March 13, 1964, for the reason that the applicant is ineligible for the issuance of a permit to reenter the United States because he has not been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence.

Applicant is a 66-year-old married native and citizen of Italy. This application was filed on September 27, 1963, with the District Director, Cleveland, Ohio, and he subsequently departed from the United States to Italy on October 26, 1963, to join his wife there. He has presented in support of his application a notarized statement in which he admits that he entered the United States unlawfully as a crewman in August, 1962. In that statement he specified that his entry occurred at Niagara Falls, New York, but in a subsequent letter to the District Director he advised that his entry actually occurred at Norfolk, Virginia, where he deserted his vessel on August 31, 1926. In support of his statements concerning his entry into this country, applicant has also submitted an official document from the Captain of the Port, Port of Catania, Italy, which corroborates the applicant's statements concerning his unlawful entry into the United States as a deserting crewman. Applicant has stated further that when he registered under the Alien Registration Act of 1940 and when he applied for a certificate of identification as an enemy alien in 1942, he assumed the identity of a person named Francesco Borsa, since he was afraid to reveal his true identity.

It is clear on the record that the applicant unlawfully entered the United States and remained here for many years in an illegal status. Having not been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, he is not eligible for a permit to reenter this country as a returning resident and the application was properly denied. The decision of the District Director will, therefore, be affirmed and the appeal will be dismissed.

ORDER: The decision of the District Director, Cleveland, Ohio, is affirmed and the appeal of the appellant is dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace