Matter of Kyriakarakos (Board decision, September 24, 1963)

Matter of Kyriakarakos (BIA ID 1365): unauthorized work barred change from visitor to student

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1365, A-13463224
Decided
September 24, 1963
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1963, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1963
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Regional Commissioner dismissed the appeal in the order below. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Greek citizen admitted as a visitor for pleasure applied to change to student status. He had begun working as a restaurant busboy before filing that application and continued working several days each week. The Regional Commissioner held that this employment violated his visitor status. Because section 248 required him to maintain the status under which he was admitted, the Commissioner dismissed his appeal from the denial.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act § 248.
  • Outcome: Denial of change to student status upheld; appeal dismissed.
  • Key point: Accepting employment while admitted as a visitor for pleasure made the applicant ineligible for the requested status change.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1365

MATTER OF KYRIAKARAKOS

In SECTION 248 Proceedings

A-13463224

Decided by Regional Commissioner September 24, 1963

Since a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure who accepted employment has failed to maintain the status under which admitted to the United States, he is ineligible for a change of nonimmigrant status to that of student under section 248, Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.

This case is before me on appeal. The District Director denied the application on the grounds that the applicant had violated the terms of his admission as a visitor for pleasure by accepting employment.

The applicant is a 27-year-old married male, a native and citizen of Greece. He was admitted into the United States as a visitor for pleasure on March 24, 1962. He has been granted extensions of temporary stay to June 28, 1963. On June 24, 1963 he applied for change of nonimmigrant status to that of a student. On August 2, 1963 he was found working as a busboy in a restaurant. In a statement under oath to a Service officer he stated he had been employed since June 13, 1963. He has been working eight hours a day for five or six days a week. By accepting employment, he violated the terms of his admission as a visitor for pleasure.

With certain exceptions not relevant in this case section 248 of the Immigration and Nationality Act provides that the classification of a nonimmigrant may be changed to another nonimmigrant classification if the alien has continued to maintain the status under which he was admitted to the United States. As the applicant has failed to maintain his nonimmigrant status, he is ineligible under the statute and his appeal must be dismissed.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal in this matter be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace