Matter of Michigan State University (Board decision, June 14, 1963)

Matter of Michigan State University (BIA ID 1363): temporary research associate qualified for visa classification

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1363, DET-N-1580
Decided
June 14, 1963
Outcome
Vacated
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1963, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1963
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Acting Regional Commissioner sustained the appeal in the order below. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

Michigan State University sought a visa for a research associate to develop materials for a new Chinese language and literature degree program. The district director denied the petition because the program would be permanent. The Acting Regional Commissioner distinguished the lasting degree program from the research associate's temporary assignment. The associate would prepare course outlines, bibliographies, and teaching materials, and the position would end when the program was organized. The Commissioner sustained the university's appeal.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act § 101(a)(15)(H)(i).
  • Outcome: District director's denial reversed; appeal sustained.
  • Key point: A permanent academic program could be created through a temporary position eligible for the requested classification.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1363

MATTER OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

In VISA PETITION Proceedings

DET-N-1580

Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner June 14, 1963.

An alien of distinguished merit and ability coming to a university as a research associate to prepare and establish course material for a new program leading to the B.A. degree in Chinese language and literature is eligible for nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i), Immigration and Nationality Act, since the position is temporary in nature and will be abolished after organization of the new program which will become a permanent part of the university curriculum.

This case is before me on appeal. The District Director denied the petition to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act on the ground that the position to be filled by the beneficiary is permanent in nature.

The requirement for the classification sought is that the beneficiary be an alien of distinguished merit and ability who is coming for a temporary period as a nonimmigrant to perform duties which are themselves temporary in nature. It is conceded that the qualifications of the beneficiary meet the high requirements of the Act. The question to be resolved is whether the duties to be performed are themselves temporary in nature.¹

¹ Matter of M—S—H—, 8 I. & N. Dec. 460.

The petitioner is initiating a program leading to a B.A. degree in Chinese language and literature in the Department of Foreign Languages. The services of the beneficiary are sought for a temporary period to prepare course outlines, bibliographies, and teaching materials for the new program. The position will be that of a Research Associate, which position will be abolished after the new program is organized. The Chairman of the Department of Foreign Languages states that this will be within a year or so. The new program in Chinese language and literature will become a permanent part of the curricula of the petitioning institution. However, the position to be filled by the beneficiary is temporary in nature. After the program is established, her services will be required no longer. The beneficiary, according to the petitioner, is eminently qualified to create the course material for the program. It is concluded that the position to be filled by the beneficiary is temporary in nature. Accordingly, the appeal will be sustained.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal in the above cited case be and the same is hereby sustained.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace