Matter of Michigan State University (Board decision, June 14, 1963)

Matter of Michigan State University (BIA ID 1362): visiting mathematics scholar held a temporary teaching role

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1362, DET-N-1605
Decided
June 14, 1963
Outcome
Vacated
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-15

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1963, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1963
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final INS Regional Commissioner decision
The Acting Regional Commissioner sustained the appeal in the order below. This published precedent records a final Service decision by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. It is not an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals; the Board-order finality rule in 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7) does not govern it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

Michigan State University sought a visa for a distinguished scholar to teach and research mathematics during one academic year. The district director denied the petition because the courses appeared in the university catalogue and the position seemed permanent. The Acting Regional Commissioner found that the listed courses were special seminars offered only when there was demand or a qualified visiting professor. They were not a permanent part of the curriculum. The Commissioner sustained the university's appeal.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act § 101(a)(15)(H)(i).
  • Outcome: District director's denial reversed; appeal sustained.
  • Key point: A catalogue listing did not make an occasional seminar a permanent teaching position.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1362

MATTER OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

In VISA PETITION Proceedings

DET-N-1605

Decided by Acting Regional Commissioner June 14, 1963

A distinguished scholar coming to a university to teach (70% of time) and do research in mathematics for an academic year is eligible for nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i), Immigration and Nationality Act, since the position is not permanent in nature; the courses to be taught, although listed in the university catalogue under an open number for credit purposes, are special seminars which are taught only by distinguished visiting professors or other qualified personnel and are not a permanent part of the curriculum.

This is a petition to import for a temporary period under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a distinguished scholar to teach and do research in mathematics for the 1963-1964 school year. The petition was denied by the District Director on the grounds that the beneficiary will be teaching a full load of courses that are listed in the University Catalogue, and the position is therefore permanent in nature.¹ The petition is before this office on appeal from that decision.

¹ Matter of M—S—H—, 8 I. & N. Dec. 460.

The beneficiary, according to the petition, is to teach and do research in mathematics for the 1963-1964 school term. The courses to be taught by the beneficiary are listed in the catalogue of the institution under an open number, for credit purposes, and are given when there is a demand or when a visiting professor is available. The beneficiary will teach for about seventy per cent of his time, the remainder will be on research.

The petitioner stated in his brief on appeal that the beneficiary would teach courses which are special and temporary in nature, which could legitimately be called Special Seminars; that the courses are listed under open number in the catalogue in order that the student may benefit creditwise. Only distinguished visiting professors or staff members with special ability give courses under this number.

It is concluded that the petitioner seeks the services of the beneficiary to do research and to teach a special seminar in mathematics. This is a course that is not a permanent part of the curricula. It is given occasionally by visiting professors or other qualified personnel to advanced students in mathematics. The appeal will be sustained.

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal in the above cited case be and the same is hereby sustained.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace