Matter of Suh (Board decision, November 6, 1962)
Matter of Suh (BIA ID 1358): orphan petition denied over concerns about care
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 1962, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A petitioner sought to bring an orphan child to the United States. He worked as a handyman and house painter without steady employment, while his wife worked nights as a hospital nursing superintendent. The couple had two daughters, and the petitioner had a record of arrests and convictions. On the record presented, the Regional Commissioner found that the couple had not established that they would properly care for the child. The District Director's denial of the petition was affirmed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authorities: Immigration and Nationality Act §§ 101(b)(1)(F) and 205(b).
- Outcome: Orphan visa petition denial affirmed.
- Key point: The petitioner and his spouse did not establish that they could properly care for the child if admitted.
Full text (BIA official public release)
Interim Decision #1358
MATTER OF SUH
In VISA PETITION Proceedings
A-13003502
Decided by Regional Commission November 6, 1962
The petitioner and spouse have not established that they will properly care for the beneficiary-child, as defined in section 101(b)(1)(F), pursuant to section 205(b), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, since they have 2 minor daughters of their own, the petitioner has no steady employment, his wife is employed as night superintendent at a hospital working from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM, and petitioner, who was discharged from the United States Army in 1944 under other than honorable conditions, has a long record of arrests and convictions, the last of which was in 1961.
This case is on certification from the District Director, Seattle, Washington, who denied the petition on the ground that it has not been established that the petitioner and spouse are able to care for the child properly if the child is admitted to the United States.¹
The petitioner works as a handyman and house painter, but he has no steady employment. He earned approximately $850.00 during the first eight months of 1962. His spouse is night superintendent of nurses at Northgate General Hospital, Seattle, and earns $440 a month. Her hours of employment are from 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM. They have two daughters of their own, who are 10 and 15 years of age. It is stated that one of the parents is always at home to care for the children.
The petitioner was discharged from the United States Army on May 5, 1944, under conditions other than honorable, because of chronic alcoholism. While in the army he was convicted four times by courts-martial for such things as being drunk in quarters and for being AWOL. He has a long arrest record. He was arrested and convicted of larceny in Seattle twice in 1958 and once in 1959, and was sentenced to serve 60 days in jail the first time and 90 days in jail the second and third times. He was arrested and fined or sentenced to jail numerous times in Washington, Oregon, and California for being drunk. The last time was on May 17, 1961.
¹ Section 205(b), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.
On the basis of the record in this case it must be concluded that the petitioner and his spouse have failed to establish that the orphan will be cared for properly if admitted to the United States. Accordingly the denial of the petition was proper and the appeal will be dismissed.
ORDER: It is ordered that the decision of the District Director be affirmed.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace