Matter of Tzimas (Board decision, September 10, 1962)

Matter of Tzimas (BIA ID 1251): Board denies adjustment to a seaman admitted in transit

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ID 1251, A-15817430
Decided
September 10, 1962
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-17

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 1962, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1962
The immigration statutes and regulations may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
Final BIA decision and published precedent
The Board dismissed the respondent's appeal from the denial of adjustment of status, leaving the deportability finding and grant of voluntary departure in place. A Board order is final on issuance unless stayed, modified, rescinded, or overruled by the Board, the Attorney General, or a federal court (8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(7); EOIR Policy Manual, Part III, Chapter 1.4(d)). This published decision is Board precedent; check subsequent history before relying on it.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official BIA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: BIA released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (justice.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Greek seaman entered the United States with a transit visa to join a vessel, later married a U.S. citizen, and applied to adjust his status. He did not contest the finding that he had stayed beyond his authorized period. He argued that the regulation barring adjustment for people arriving to serve on vessels should not apply because he had been admitted as an alien in transit. The Board held that the Attorney General's regulation bound it and covered a person who arrived to join a vessel as a crewman. It dismissed the appeal from the denial of adjustment; the special inquiry officer had granted voluntary departure.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Immigration and Nationality Act §§ 101(a)(15)(C), 241(a)(2), and 245(a); 8 C.F.R. § 245.1, as discussed in the decision.
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed; adjustment denied; voluntary departure grant remained in place.
  • Key point: Entry with a transit visa did not avoid the regulation excluding a person destined to join a vessel as a crewman from adjustment of status.

Full text (BIA official public release)

Interim Decision #1251

MATTER OF TZIMAS

In DEPORTATION Proceedings
A-15817430
Decided by Board September 10, 1962
Respondent, who upon arrival in the United States was destined to join a vessel as a crewman, is ineligible for adjustment of his status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 CFR 245.1), despite his admission as an alien in transit under section 101(a) (15) (C) of that Act.

CHARGE :
Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2)]—Remained longer.

This is an appeal from the order of the special inquiry officer finding respondent deportable on the ground stated above and denying his application for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigra- tion and Nationality Act. Voluntary departure was granted. The appeal will be dismissed. No issue is taken with the finding of deportability. The special inquiry officer found respondent ineligible for adjustment of status because of his belief that respondent came within the terms of a regu- lation which states that an alien crewman or an alien coming to the United States to serve on a vessel cannot qualify for the relief. Counsel contends that the regulation is invalid for it enlarges the classes of persons who cannot obtain relief under the express terms of the statute; and he contends that the regulation does not apply in any event because respondent was not admitted to the United States as a crewman or alien destined to join a vessel, but was admitted in transit. The respondent is a 25-year-old married male, a native and citizen of Greece, who was admitted to the United States on July 12, 1961, upon presentation of a C-1 visa (alien in transit, section 101(a) (15) (C) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 (a) (15) (C) ) . 1 Respondent was injured; he was permitted to remain in the United States until August 10, 1961. Before the date of his departure, he obtained a divorce from his wife 1 At oral argument counsel supplied the information that an investigation

conducted by him revealed that an individual coming to the United States to take employment on a vessel could have been issued a D-1 (crewman) visa under section 101(a) (15) (D) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a) (15) (D).

101
Interim Decision #1251
in Greece; in February 1962 he married a United States citizen. A visa petition filed by respondent's wife was approved on April 12, 1962. Respondent filed an application for adjustment of status under section 245(a) of the Act at his deportation hearing on July 2, 1962. The agents of the steamship line to which respondent was destined when he entered the United States have furnished the information that respondent's entry was for the purpose of employment as a seaman on a vessel (Ex. 7). The respondent admits that when he came to the United States he had a seaman's book to ship as a crewman and that he came here to reship on a vessel of the line on which he had arrived (pp. 13, 14). In arriving at the finding of ineligibility, the special inquiry officer relied upon section 245.1 of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Supp. 1962) which provides in pertinent part as follows : An alien who on arrival in the United States was serving in any capacity on board a vessel or aircraft, or was destined to join a vessel or aircraft in the United States to serve in any capacity thereon, or was not admitted or paroled following inspection by an immigration officer is not eligible for the benefits of section 245 of the Act. * * * 2 The Attorney General is given the power to prescribe the regulations for the enforcement of section 245(a) of the Act. His regulation is binding upon the Board. The regulation excludes from the benefits of section 245 (a) of the Act a person coming to the United States to join a vessel on which he is to serve as an alien crewman; respondent is such a person. The appeal must be dismissed. ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed. 2 For reasons hereinafter set forth no discussion of counsel's contentions will be made; however, so that the contentions may be understood, pertinent portions of the law and regulations will be set forth. Section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(a) ) reads as follows: The status of an alien, other than an alien crewman, who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States may be adjusted by the Attorney General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if * * * The term "crewman" is defined to mean "a person serving in any capacity on board a vessel or aircraft" (section 101(a) (10) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a) (10) ). An "alien crewman" is described as follows :
[A]n alien crewman serving in good faith as such in any capacity required for normal operation and service on board a vessel (other than a fishing vessel having its home port or an operating base in the United States) or aircraft, who intends to land temporarily and solely in pursuit of his calling as a crewman and to depart from the United States with the vessel or aircraft on which he arrived or some other vessel or aircraft; (section 101(a) (15) (D), 8 U.S.C. 1101 (a ) (15) (D)).
102

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace