Christopher Coal Company
Christopher Coal Company (FMSHRC IBMA 77-7): $6,500 penalty affirmed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1978, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Christopher Coal Company appealed an Administrative Law Judge decision assessing a $6,500 civil penalty for violating 30 C.F.R. § 75.329 at its Osage No. 3 Mine. The Commission reviewed the record and concluded that the company had not shown a reason to disturb the judge’s findings, legal conclusions, or penalty amount. It affirmed the judge’s decision and ordered Christopher Coal Company to pay the $6,500 penalty within 10 days of the Commission decision. The order did not alter the underlying violation or penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.329
- Outcome: The ALJ decision assessing a $6,500 civil penalty was affirmed.
- Key point: The Commission found the record supported the judge’s decision and the penalty was reasonable under the Mine Act.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
CHRISTOPHER COAL COMPANY
IBMA 77-7 Decided October 25, 1978
Appeal by Christopher Coal Company from a decision dated October 18, 1976, in Docket No. MORG 76-8-P, by Administrative Law Judge John F. Cook, assessing a civil monetary penalty of $6,500 for a violation of 30 CFR 75.329 contained in an imminent danger order of withdrawal issued at appellant's Osage No. 3 Mine.
Affirmed.
APPEARANCES: Alan B. Mollohan, Esq., Rose, Schmidt, Dixon, Haseley,
Whyte and Hardesty, Attorney for appellant, Christopher Coal Company;
John H. O'Donnell, Esq., Attorney for appellant, Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) formerly Mining Enforcement and Safety Administration (MESA).
DECISION
Having reviewed the record and considered the brief of the appellant and response thereto, the Commission finds that Christopher Coal Company has not demonstrated any reason why the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decision of the Administrative Law Judge should not be affirmed. The record supports the decision and order of the Judge and the amount assessed for the violation is reasonable and in accord with the intent and purposes of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969. Furthermore, the arguments made on appeal to the Commission have been fully and fairly considered by the Judge in his decision and order.
ORDER
WHEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in Section 109(a)(3) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969; Section 110(i) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, and Section 301(c)(3) of the Amendments Act of 1977, IT IS ORDERED:
1) that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge issued October 18, 1976, assessing Christopher Coal Company a civil penalty in the amount of Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500.00) IS HEREBY AFFIRMED; and
2) that Christopher Coal Company pay the civil penalty assessed on or before 10 days from the date of this decision.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1978. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.