Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Monterey Coal Company (ALJ decision, January 8, 1986)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Monterey Coal Company (FMSHRC HOPE 79-323-P): Settlement removes owner from penalty case
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought penalties against Monterey Coal Company for three alleged safety violations connected with a fatal shaft sinking accident at its Wayne Mine. The shaft work was supervised and controlled by an independent contractor, Frontier-Kemper Constructors. Under the parties' settlement, the Secretary would remove Monterey as the cited operator and pursue the allegations against Frontier-Kemper in a separate penalty proceeding. Judge William Fauver approved the settlement, canceled the scheduled hearing, and dismissed the case against Monterey without a penalty. The decision does not identify the three safety standards by number or decide the contractor's liability.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: Three mandatory safety standards are mentioned but not identified by number.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; case against Monterey dismissed without a penalty assessment.
- Key point: The Secretary agreed to proceed against the contractor that controlled the shaft work rather than continue the penalty case against the mine owner.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MONTEREY COAL
DDATE:
19860108
TTEXT:
~44
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. HOPE 79-323-P
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 46-05121-03008F
v. Wayne Mine
MONTEREY COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Fauver
The parties have moved for approval of a settlement to dismiss this proceeding, upon the following grounds:
1. On May 8, 1978, Section 107(a) imminent danger Withdrawal Order No. 25842 was issued to Monterey at its Wayne Mine for three alleged violations of the mandatory safety standards which are the subject of the present civil penalty proceeding.
2. The violations were issued as a result of a fatal shaft sinking accident which occurred at the mine on May 5, 1978.
3. At the time the accident occurred, the intake air shaft at the Wayne Mine was being constructed by FrontierÄKemper Constructors ("FrontierÄKemper"), an independent contractor employed by Monterey for the purpose of conducting the shaft sinking operations.
4. While the shaft sinking operations at the Wayne Mine were under the direct supervision and control of FrontierÄKemper, MSHA enforcement policy on May 8, 1978, was to cite the mine owner-operator for all violations which occurred on mine property. Therefore, Withdrawal Order No. 25842 was issued to Monterey instead of FrontierÄKemper which was actually conducting the operations which resulted in the three violations at issue.
~45
5. MSHA's enforcement policy with regard to issuing citations or orders to independent contractors was later revised and on July 26, 1985, Order No. 28542 was modified to include FrontierÄKemper as the operator responsible for the three alleged violations.
6. On December 13, 1985, the Secretary filed a civil penalty proceeding with this Commission against FrontierÄKemper, Docket No. WEVA 86Ä76, for the same three violations at issue in this proceeding. It is now the intention of the Secretary to proceed solely against FrontierÄKemper as the operator responsible for the violations at issue.
7. Therefore, the following settlement has been agreed to by the parties:
a. The Secretary will modify Order No. 28542 to delete Monterey as the cited operator; and
b. The Secretary will and hereby does move to dismiss this civil penalty proceeding against Monterey without penalty assessment.
I conclude that the settlement should be approved.
ORDER
WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The motion for approval of settlement is GRANTED.
2. The hearing set for January 9, 1986, is CANCELLED.
3. This proceeding is DISMISSED.
William Fauver
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace